Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/57] 4.14.142-stable review
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20190904175301.777414715@linuxfoundation.org>
 <5d705444.1c69fb81.c4927.1cd1@mx.google.com> <7hlfv3shk0.fsf@baylibre.com>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <6b9adb14-47ec-cd94-d2a2-c79d22d43d76@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 20:48:07 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7hlfv3shk0.fsf@baylibre.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 9/4/19 5:38 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org> writes:
> 
>> stable-rc/linux-4.14.y boot: 144 boots: 5 failed, 131 passed with 8 offline (v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4)
>>
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.14.y/kernel/v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.14.y/kernel/v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4/
>>
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: linux-4.14.y
>> Git Describe: v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4
>> Git Commit: 39a17ab1edd4adb3fb732726a36cb54a21cc570d
>> Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 68 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 14 builds out of 201
>>
>> Boot Failures Detected:
>>
>> arm:
>>      vexpress_defconfig:
>>          gcc-8:
>>              qemu_arm-virt-gicv3: 5 failed labs
> 
> All 5 failures are for this same QEMU target in multiple labs
> 
> It is also failing in linux-next and on several other stable versions.
> 

linux-next is in bad shape due to some usb issues, but I am not sure otherwise.
I ran a quick test on 4.14.y-queue, and all my (arm, arm64) qemu tests are fine.

Is it possible that this is a new or modified test ?

Guenter