Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030285AbVLVTEt (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:04:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030289AbVLVTEt (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:04:49 -0500 Received: from webmail.univie.ac.at ([131.130.1.47]:53239 "EHLO webmail1.univie.ac.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030285AbVLVTEt (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:04:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1386.81.217.14.229.1135278280.squirrel@webmail.univie.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20051222183012.GA27353@buici.com> References: <200512221352.23393.axel.kernel@kittenberger.net> <20051222173704.GB23411@buici.com> <1167.81.217.14.229.1135275158.squirrel@webmail.univie.ac.at> <20051222183012.GA27353@buici.com> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:04:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Possible Bootloader Optimization in inflate (get rid of unnecessary 32k Window) From: "Axel Kittenberger" To: "Marc Singer" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 20 > Right. And the time to perform that one copy is exactly...? > > I doubt that it is a significant percentage of the whole operation. Well Yes I agree, I guess also it isn't. Its roughly the time you need to copy 1 MB memory around. I just noticed that it is in fact after all still unneccary and that in fact could be optimized away. As some window-management could can be optimized away. I would volunteer to take the time to code it, but only if i have a good feeling that it would be accepted... if not, well than okay for me also, i will do other things :o) Greetings, Axel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/