Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp793818ybe; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 06:08:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3w11kxKDwLWjeCnscBMhXSolPIGFg12eW9WmFk/+Rezu/6m9hDH4MU+uPz4PmROozSqtC X-Received: by 2002:a63:7d05:: with SMTP id y5mr3086618pgc.425.1567688909682; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 06:08:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567688909; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w7n8jTP4PrJ1HPjkp38a0WY2/JYmaw/Vq77gecSQRGsVs2kEQ8EL33QbmmqTeZBBfv 1o1sbOVjrWu1odg8S0vSAC8fKZOmxge4z8YZgaxzrnUu9wP4X46AfTatRzz4650HJjfN QClv+Qcpx8j/o8Ec/OiQu4rGvF5pSmWFtHdEs36qvAq2HDM7SkMZG1y2CrQwqNmx4Xw7 V1pPoie26s7/HfOg7caGVD+iDIkgNj0JWoljFXgmnzFZ+rPSorjxQY+ttYlxKuYN+oh+ r6AkN7a+ABPzWXqFBw3duOfz7VJSNW3IlpOgsnc5npKhV1lsqJ72+f3NkcX+gnxtzYlB Yjkw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=CujEh/dtrA0sAVZBbcV/9UrCMOt4AJ1lksSLNGeLRn8=; b=rDsRc7JyFec+uZtlQq9hKj7+oxpDS9c/cpjfg4x6koTRF7sTAWL2frgzb9G3Fq2O6j +Q2AA2mMnUFvAFuARLNIX6CUa8zoJUmE1nNXtyMx9+wUWH/tU+1VQ67C7NYOqKydgt5M 3E+4M5RL34SqF+7h/wE8RRG28CbIfjvhIR0/bg7VM2KqFy3ocqZAQTq3sU31fyRhtA3F S1Nqzb9yCL/FpvJqvzKvJF6j95CAK1KTegHwPdu2B9LZaONxJen2RFwnuskStUpOo24h aB3HMmPKGaJ3NrqyN9es7O7Io9RgZqk9H9syDPnVge2y69i4VBiNqn+XLslA7DHfPSZk 2FYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r10si1660086pgv.530.2019.09.05.06.08.12; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 06:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388480AbfIELae (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:30:34 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:60466 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725921AbfIELad (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:30:33 -0400 Received: from [213.220.153.21] (helo=wittgenstein) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1i5pxg-0002oG-P2; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 11:30:00 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:29:59 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Aleksa Sarai , Al Viro , Jeff Layton , "J. Bruce Fields" , Arnd Bergmann , David Howells , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Christian Brauner , Eric Biederman , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Alexei Starovoitov , Kees Cook , Jann Horn , Tycho Andersen , David Drysdale , Chanho Min , Oleg Nesterov , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Aleksa Sarai , Linus Torvalds , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/12] lib: introduce copy_struct_{to,from}_user helpers Message-ID: <20190905112958.ldzyzyuqn5akkhzy@wittgenstein> References: <20190904201933.10736-1-cyphar@cyphar.com> <20190904201933.10736-2-cyphar@cyphar.com> <20190905110544.d6c5t7rx25kvywmi@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:17:38PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > On 05/09/2019 13.05, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:19:22AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > > >> + if (unlikely(!access_ok(dst, usize))) > >> + return -EFAULT; > >> + > >> + /* Deal with trailing bytes. */ > >> + if (usize < ksize) { > >> + if (memchr_inv(src + size, 0, rest)) > >> + return -EFBIG; > >> + } else if (usize > ksize) { > >> + if (__memzero_user(dst + size, rest)) > >> + return -EFAULT; > > > > Is zeroing that memory really our job? Seems to me we should just check > > it is zeroed. > > Of course it is, otherwise you'd require userspace to clear the output > buffer it gives us, which in the majority of cases is wasted work. It's > much easier to reason about if we just say "the kernel populates [uaddr, > uaddr + usize)". I don't really mind either way so sure. :)