Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030326AbVLVVuc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:50:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030327AbVLVVuc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:50:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:42114 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030326AbVLVVub (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:50:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:44:46 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Mark Maule Cc: Greg KH , linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] msi abstractions and support for altix Message-ID: <20051222214446.GC14978@kroah.com> References: <20051222201651.2019.37913.96422@lnx-maule.americas.sgi.com> <20051222202259.GA4959@suse.de> <20051222202627.GI17552@sgi.com> <20051222203415.GA28240@suse.de> <20051222203824.GJ17552@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051222203824.GJ17552@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1582 Lines: 36 On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:38:24PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:34:15PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:26:27PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:22:59PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:15:44PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote: > > > > > Resend #2: including linuxppc64-dev and linux-pci as well as PCI maintainer > > > > > > > > I'll wait for Resend #3 based on my previous comments before considering > > > > adding it to my kernel trees:) > > > > > > > > > > Resend #2 includes the correction to the irq_vector[] declaration, and I > > > responded to the question about setting irq_vector[0] if that's what you > > > mean ... > > > > Sorry, but I missed that last response. Why do you set the [0] value in > > a #ifdef now? > > Because on ia64 IA64_FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR and IA64_LAST_DEVICE_VECTOR > (from which MSI FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR/LAST_DEVICE_VECTOR are derived) are not > constants. The are now global variables (see change to asm-ia64/hw_irq.h) > to allow the platform to override them. Altix uses a reduced range of > vectors for devices, and this change was necessary to make assign_irq_vector() > to work on altix. I'm with Matthew on this one, that's not a real fix for this. What would PPC64 do in this case? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/