Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mmu notifer debug annotations
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/5] mmu notifer debug annotations
Thread-Index: AQHVY/kqS7drW7tYS0OaX2gILgkMmw==
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:49:49 +0000
Message-ID: <20190905144946.GA22237@mellanox.com>
References: <20190826201425.17547-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20190826201425.17547-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [193.47.165.251]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bd59b6ed-9733-4cb9-93a1-08d732104cd9
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020);SRVR:VI1PR05MB4256;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR05MB4256:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR05MB4256562AB84B0844F93239FCCFBB0@VI1PR05MB4256.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 015114592F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(199004)(53754006)(189003)(8676002)(8936002)(386003)(3846002)(81156014)(76176011)(54906003)(53936002)(86362001)(102836004)(6246003)(6116002)(7736002)(2906002)(6506007)(305945005)(52116002)(316002)(81166006)(6916009)(25786009)(6486002)(229853002)(99286004)(26005)(4326008)(66946007)(5660300002)(6512007)(33656002)(36756003)(66476007)(1076003)(486006)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(71190400001)(71200400001)(66066001)(6436002)(14454004)(4744005)(446003)(256004)(478600001)(2616005)(11346002)(476003)(186003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:VI1PR05MB4256;H:VI1PR05MB4141.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: mellanox.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: geCeaHgd+mTKJRfX0h8gvuKXdvU/D8ZbTSHB4mhrm2Me8VcHwpHYJc+wlFsXtVITXFTkDADEQrLgVkhX3xvCrSBvJ4rLeopOBUEB02R6wacHlBME4CxFnlLj0TvdU0KaOL0QrZUegiIoukQmR/BoFLvdD+EJL8/6Q7pOGI1ZZ9wVZzgWrMm54CdPLVO5zjqQCYhrrNm6FjMhexWllbWaOVjSlHjqiFJeHDrmiqdTRsB3/29e8Pzxhiw9ZjvUj503cIlB4EHlebiG3W5EEbQDbKE6Fq7HhiPBz19wGhhpOnc1U2s3iCJKzTm+l3pCMwMtTRET8T6YBI4AsKsTSkV0Qp1+9t+xwSwD1U/aMXpTkTs7TEYJUQvtqy8OzP9DRdCgqo6kQY6MweqwH+HzYgMidcUmsDmg5MPqEdgIyMn7cH8=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <04647BF6CC7E11449F589A453BE4B4E0@eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Mellanox.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bd59b6ed-9733-4cb9-93a1-08d732104cd9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Sep 2019 14:49:49.6232
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a652971c-7d2e-4d9b-a6a4-d149256f461b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: nIf7WPDv3hzOOYMebUEEqA6sns02aoy3i+7TzAv8K6XpVea92/6MStbqsC3FkWMLN9kpmF/pokNlZ7rRT63uWw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR05MB4256
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:14:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> Next round. Changes:
>=20
> - I kept the two lockdep annotations patches since when I rebased this
>   before retesting linux-next didn't yet have them. Otherwise unchanged
>   except for a trivial conflict.
>=20
> - Ack from Peter Z. on the kernel.h patch.
>=20
> - Added annotations for non_block to invalidate_range_end. I can't test
>   that readily since i915 doesn't use it.
>=20
> - Added might_sleep annotations to also make sure the mm side keeps up
>   it's side of the contract here around what's allowed and what's not.
>=20
> Comments, feedback, review as usual very much appreciated.
>=20
>=20
> Daniel Vetter (5):
>   kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end()
>   mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable

These two applied to hmm.git, with the small check patch edit, thanks!

Jason