Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:34:56 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
        wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: qcom: support pre-timeout when the bark irq
 is available
Message-ID: <20190905183456.GA29500@roeck-us.net>
References: <20190905182419.26539-1-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190905182419.26539-1-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:24:19PM +0200, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> Use the bark interrupt as the pre-timeout notifier whenever this
> interrupt is available.
> 
> By default, the pretimeout notification shall occur one second earlier
> than the timeout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>

Can you please give people time to reply before flooding the mailing list
with revisions ? This is getting annoying quite rapidly. I am going to
reply to v2, as I had started on that already (and to the one without
subject before).

Guenter