Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:36:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:35:57 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:16132 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:35:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20001110222416.B300@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:24:16 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Dag Brattli Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [RANT] Linux-IrDA status In-Reply-To: <200011081215.MAA69418@tepid.osl.fast.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <200011081215.MAA69418@tepid.osl.fast.no>; from Dag Brattli on Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:15:48PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Some options: > > 1) Split up the large patch and fix the things you didn't like, submit them > with better discription. But then It's probably to late anyway for 2.4 (even if > the 2.4-test series is not the most stable stuff I've tried). Is it > to late for this? Probably not. Get tytso to agree that broken IrDA is critical bug, split patches, and see them accepted. > 2) Remove IrDA from the kernel, and we'll go back to using CVS and > make our own package (like PCMCIA and IrDA was before they got > into the kernel. At least PCMCIA used to work back then ;-) Do not do that, please. > 3) Just apply the stuff!?! Look at Jean's mail for description of > the changes. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/