Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc:     "mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        "jglisse@redhat.com" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
References: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <20190905135907.GB6011@mellanox.com>
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190905135907.GB6011@mellanox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:27:34PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> Per request from Michael and Jason, the metadata accelreation is
>> reverted in this version and rework in next version.
>>
>> Please review.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jason Wang (2):
>>    Revert "vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address"
>>    vhost: re-introducing metadata acceleration through kernel virtual
>>      address
> There are a bunch of patches in the queue already that will help
> vhost, and I a working on one for next cycle that will help alot more
> too.


I will check those patches, but if you can give me some pointers or 
keywords it would be much appreciated.


>
> I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other
> patch for next..
>
> Jason


Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle.

Thanks