Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030371AbVLWCRR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:17:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030379AbVLWCRR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:17:17 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:11709 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030371AbVLWCRQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:17:16 -0500 Message-ID: <43AB5E12.5050208@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:16:50 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Paul Rolland , "'Arjan van de Ven'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linux 2.4.32] SATA ICH5/PIIX and Combined mode References: <1135164891.3456.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200512211140.jBLBeGD31936@tag.witbe.net> <20051223015752.GD27525@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20051223015752.GD27525@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "srv2.dvmed.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:40:18PM +0100, Paul Rolland wrote: >>My first idea was to consider this as an opportunity to upgrade to the >>latest 2.4.x kernel, but reading you, this looks like a bad idea... >>2.6.x would be better ? > > > RHES3 doesn't support kernel 2.6. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [69.134.188.146 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 659 Lines: 22 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:40:18PM +0100, Paul Rolland wrote: >>My first idea was to consider this as an opportunity to upgrade to the >>latest 2.4.x kernel, but reading you, this looks like a bad idea... >>2.6.x would be better ? > > > RHES3 doesn't support kernel 2.6. Kernel 2.6.x will boot just fine, on RHEL3 userland. It is not -supported- in the commercial sense, however. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/