Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1097214ybe; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 11:48:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy7buzUWqvHmI20Y/jmrP6ySgrKsuPLI4x7hTPSYgo+schNwtazTThKhvJFrw3jq023sWvH X-Received: by 2002:a65:52c5:: with SMTP id z5mr9333859pgp.118.1567795721499; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 11:48:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567795721; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pBqXsJC+0ri4m8UUYuYcjVvYI4xizvfBc0bCHmeQ6jqG4W7ImklnxtZH2fYzwSUW9u 2p4n7tGmbRjuHlC+ur6UiQhx/bJumpy5njYt9joKViLIjy4hqV/0OslgwZC5vLlYrnb+ ENyI1RJCbzFgY1VWAeF6kwS53ms4byBbWQXI9+SMomfSRIKWC+CA6W5bisno40USoveV +tz/ZpMh73sWw1hFD/wJL7NePWZr67HK7YwHkw/8/4gGTTwPlA0ww6dEETkhyKiPhtzc x3WhJWgBgsxDRvOMdf8EwmaZMXPQOGXaRn9C8o/PNyt1STO5m3EvGNf4TfaGqr7avA8U ooVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=ZKf9JK0nwFOyRNd0XhjN61/WMQlUYN9qWSOcxSMTS3Y=; b=1DT+tjuqHRX4wKUu5ueZzElOol5H2OhS+qoFHPnoTGPQSSwKDO5Q+AvhHd+kZUcnEo v5w2ORv9yh5L4RpR3FJOR+SC6LRmvdIg09yFhF0gNkVzpjUWdjUHIIB6n0YjSN4nGkHa ADxaCzJUfVlIf+ViROaGYVSYDarUFF2aTMOKIX+Uqr7CPzzSHc14fOPg7W8tqnLA4rSe Xmqd4i1+U7E2rtdRZYEjfQMhJMA0BwgV73Gg282SWvCLhGr+0f3CGEFuxxePKrjRtHcs gFuJnOIrmsQvbTpOb5BaNLVEt5YM+OzdT8I5VUt592DVjCFRqFDenx7Y9SC76wsyaReR wHPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i6si5464311pjs.13.2019.09.06.11.48.26; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 11:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2393142AbfIFNPJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:15:09 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:59972 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388106AbfIFNPJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:15:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [88.214.184.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78D8F152F5C9A; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 06:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 15:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20190906.151505.1486178691190611604.davem@davemloft.net> To: jasowang@redhat.com Cc: jgg@mellanox.com, mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, jglisse@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com> References: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20190905135907.GB6011@mellanox.com> <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 06 Sep 2019 06:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jason Wang Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800 > On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other >> patch for next.. >> >> Jason > > Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle. Then you should reset patch #1 all by itself targetting 'net'.