Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:17:20 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@erdfelt.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@oracle.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com,
        konrad.wilk@oracle.com, patrick.colp@oracle.com,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Add an option to reload microcode even if
 revision is unchanged
Message-ID: <20190906171720.GM19008@zn.tnic>
References: <20190905072029.GB19246@zn.tnic>
 <20190905194044.GA3663@otc-nc-03>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1909052316130.1902@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20190905222706.GA4422@otc-nc-03>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1909061431330.1902@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20190906144039.GA29569@sventech.com>
 <20190906151617.GE19008@zn.tnic>
 <20190906154618.GB29569@sventech.com>
 <20190906161735.GH19008@zn.tnic>
 <20190906165207.GC29569@sventech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190906165207.GC29569@sventech.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:52:07AM -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> That doesn't mean that late loading isn't still useful.

If it weren't useful, it would've been gone a long time ago. No one is
arguing whether it is useful or not.

> Just as I can't know for sure that every future microcode update will be
> safely late loadable, you can't know for sure that every future microcode
> update won't be safely late loadable.

Well, you know what can happen so good luck, I guess.

> We do use other techniques as well particularly when it's not time
> sensitive.

So you reboot or not? Do you do reboot-similar techniques where you can
potentially do early microcode loading too?

> It very much makes it right because it's still a tool that can be used
> safely in the right cases. Just because it can't be used 100% of the time
> (even if it is close to that in practice) doesn't make it magically unsafe
> either.

As I said, good luck with that. It's not like you haven't been warned
about what can happen.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette