Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1994981ybe; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 06:59:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwNkt+eORGWK0nf2rFOK1DWz5gggoVcZ8jGpEFiTskzZOt6pLnx6JPJAOcwCBTcR/FdISuM X-Received: by 2002:a63:e62:: with SMTP id 34mr12507713pgo.331.1567864759617; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:59:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1567864759; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OB40dPLGRqeNWFgQ4feOfXJFdc/lQtwM9rfNE6FysU53jqGFvsfo5XeZ1cr967HeqX KRf+oa8pcptpmsAOqR5vtHlxZFhkvRd/ILF4bG/TX3XTHQPvyFeGLAZPaGXMnKbUPLaE R0kBOvWFcFdrNvdnd9uIy2Azf98OQWBZQJGBbIf1k4ryoXtq5NlU9TlxYE9Y3WKZuNSQ WKFF2uv1NMbI67/PBza6Btca7MgvWCgPs+cO32RI5YXj98kBvupz0KXhFWJZ2MJfLFyj lSNgj2UcdHJsoRn5KgoVpu18ASR1ygZAf4V41n2ghrnutF3++eFlm1AyRTDRGAIcPfMC CGGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:to :from:date:dkim-signature; bh=EWIhvlIYQYgSNiR0JTK+22rY1hmZeqOgk/eFbmgddQ8=; b=wCALtDetu49v0wpHNmcHe6ZHnQfeqzVIDxAl67ufZfACsJU7L9Zk4X45X98olfNlEN 9sCRnhplqhN1YTKa73dno97wdHp+p58fKXB610yxhUEAwDzLviPATG9gcq5TwMf+TCb4 ReCC5n+DgvbZjGfbPHBLbRgvF0DRGGgAPoojVkqKiOK+3KX5WAnXDLTIIJSOilaF6TCf 526bs5oRJOh8Es3DotR7osl+VQCtmUbCRS5/FF4ZLCEbfU8mhABZFQYj9fWN64wFmXfR b+DiXoEQr7yMl8LOwWxDXWg6Gbquvt6LSCZm+c9OhsbIPld+pEnTtp6nNiOfpLeHDHSW BFNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bgFCB1+X; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1si7711177pje.44.2019.09.07.06.59.04; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bgFCB1+X; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391998AbfIFRrJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:47:09 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196]:37849 "EHLO mail-qk1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726626AbfIFRrJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:47:09 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f196.google.com with SMTP id u184so3513513qkd.4; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:47:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EWIhvlIYQYgSNiR0JTK+22rY1hmZeqOgk/eFbmgddQ8=; b=bgFCB1+Xb3oPlPNkF9mxMixq6tix1sDigEgne7DbcjtoTb8LtQM7bLEI8c6fEXGCEr QaHWSZoj3I9DLutfVeqVeVjKk01MvMzmnJ5RN6ksDEMplQnSb10hgSbKLM5rfMhtdKMs Oe+ChhyonTqOb55VzVqfon+xG8M4HF5Iy0nBxlBctV5XMCK8HXTlb1IZAdRVPTm2Inhk heOaX5Le/iwR2acsfOMZeV59m5BrRXaierEsmimERyzjDxzbL1Ja4pVjyENMtzpn0ECh 4zhTX6QX5XA0QAOF9ucUmOXK2eQOVaULfQkgVrWNM9YsAzt0IiQ0NUKimVeRI9CRlWP7 UAwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EWIhvlIYQYgSNiR0JTK+22rY1hmZeqOgk/eFbmgddQ8=; b=McFnKFrS5udd3vNj9qfwvXUY7dlGKHuC9znr7Sz6umXSSPgs95VFqxyqbQHTEnPaxT ZT8WmjVdhcSkM0catLmaUGy8HpfW4aS7gku0iYg0wYtQJj1d6USauKVKBTKzuZP4e7sM 5+3Gm718HDiRY/Zdq3Ey8q+066cNiMO7cA8TgbIL0Pi+VCM+sF14cJIZ4tVs7VssncsS OjSBNqqvbC9kiqXU/egiOAZjrAz9Zh0VmVp3ja6xqd2/n+R+jPHTHxzGl2AbMKl6CS0C qWzT3u0AHoD2urdqq8rg2/mJ+OM9g+bNzDgwC2pKYzeoSwuyOxog4UTviMFali9xSjmF GvAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUOHU8xMPhWROldFQlmv0kc7m3u5CBCR+Fil4Q7a8ZXqCoEhbYM yytFnexBjp2rr2oKt0xLLzM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:15f4:: with SMTP id p20mr9769193qkm.282.1567792028327; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:480::e7cb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m92sm2801385qte.50.2019.09.06.10.46.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:47:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 10:46:56 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: dsterba@suse.cz, josef@toxicpanda.com, clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3 btrfs/for-next] btrfs: fix cgroup writeback support Message-ID: <20190906174656.GQ2263813@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> References: <20190710192818.1069475-1-tj@kernel.org> <20190726151321.GF2868@twin.jikos.cz> <20190905115937.GA2850@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190905115937.GA2850@twin.jikos.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, David. On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:59:37PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:13:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 12:28:13PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patchset contains only the btrfs part of the following patchset. > > > > > > [1] [PATCHSET v2 btrfs/for-next] blkcg, btrfs: fix cgroup writeback support > > > > > > The block part has already been applied to > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/ for-linus > > > > > > with some naming changes. This patchset has been updated accordingly. > > > > I'm going to add this patchset to for-next to get some testing coverage, > > there are some comments pending, but that are changelog updates and > > refactoring. > > No updates, so patchset stays in for-next, closest merge target is 5.5. Sorry about dropping the ball. It looked like Chris and Nikolay weren't agreeing so I wasn't sure what the next step should be and then forgot about it. The following is the discussion. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c2419d01-5c84-3fb4-189e-4db519d08796@suse.com/ What do you think about the exchange? Thanks. -- tejun