Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:03:26 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To:     Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc:     "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Enhance the hv_vmbus driver to support hibernation
Message-ID: <20190906200325.GD1528@sasha-vm>
References: <1567724446-30990-1-git-send-email-decui@microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1567724446-30990-1-git-send-email-decui@microsoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 11:01:14PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
>This patchset (consisting of 9 patches) was part of the v4 patchset (consisting
>of 12 patches):
>    https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/2/894
>
>The other 3 patches in v4 are posted in another patchset, which will go
>through the tip.git tree.
>
>All the 9 patches here are now rebased to the hyperv tree's hyperv-next branch:
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git/log/?h=hyperv-next
>, and all the 9 patches have Michael Kelley's Signed-off-by's.
>
>Please review.

Given that these two series depend on each other, I'd much prefer for
them to go through one tree.

But, I may be wrong, and I'm going to see if a scenario such as this
make sense. I've queued this one to the hyperv-next, but I'll wait for
the x86 folks to send their pull request to Linus first before I do it
for these patches.

Usually cases such as these are the exception, but for Hyper-V it seems
to be the norm, so I'm curious to see how this will unfold.

--
Thanks,
Sasha