Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161061AbVLWVll (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:41:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161063AbVLWVll (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:41:41 -0500 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:3782 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161061AbVLWVlk (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:41:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:41:38 +0100 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: nfs insecure_locks / Tru64 behaviour Message-ID: <20051223214138.GA25727@lina.inka.de> References: <1135371520.8555.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1135371520.8555.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 961 Lines: 21 On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:58:40PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Huh? No it doesn't. The Linux NLM server requires that the client > authenticate using AUTH_SYS (unless you use insecure_locks), but it > certainly doesn't require you to have root privileges. That would > violate POSIX locking rules. Yes, however True64 does not authenticate (properly), thats why you need the option if you want to do locking. Gruss Bernd -- (OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@M?rscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de -- ( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/ o--o 1024D/E383CD7E eckes@IRCNet v:+497211603874 f:+49721151516129 (O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/