Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation
To:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc:     jgg@mellanox.com, mst@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com,
        jglisse@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
References: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <20190905135907.GB6011@mellanox.com>
 <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com>
 <20190906.151505.1486178691190611604.davem@davemloft.net>
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <bb9ae371-58b7-b7fc-b728-b5c5f55d3a91@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:18:01 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190906.151505.1486178691190611604.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 2019/9/6 下午9:15, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800
>
>> On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other
>>> patch for next..
>>>
>>> Jason
>> Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle.
> Then you should reset patch #1 all by itself targetting 'net'.


Thanks for the reminding. I want the patch to go through Michael's vhost  
tree, that's why I don't put 'net' prefix. For next time, maybe I can  
use "vhost" as a prefix for classification?