Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:12:13 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>, pavel@ucw.cz,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
        dmurphy@ti.com, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add a generic driver for LED-based backlight
Message-ID: <20190909111213.objkrztpikruhgzi@holly.lan>
References: <20190717141514.21171-1-jjhiblot@ti.com>
 <283d9044-df2d-b176-bea9-7e1520d9cf56@gmail.com>
 <20190722070620.GD8402@dell>
 <9cbd9cf6-3422-85df-885f-904f52e9cabd@gmail.com>
 <e8b4bf9a-2ee2-a496-c4de-1ed643211ec7@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e8b4bf9a-2ee2-a496-c4de-1ed643211ec7@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 06:17:50PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 7/22/19 11:23 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > On 7/22/19 9:06 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 7/17/19 4:15 PM, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> >>>> This series aims to add a led-backlight driver, similar to pwm-backlight,
> >>>> but using a LED class device underneath.
> >>>>
> >>>> A few years ago (2015), Tomi Valkeinen posted a series implementing a
> >>>> backlight driver on top of a LED device:
> >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7293991/
> >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7294001/
> >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7293981/
> >>>>
> >>>> The discussion stopped because Tomi lacked the time to work on it.
> >>>>
> >>>> changes in v4:
> >>>> - fix dev_err() messages and commit logs following the advices of Pavel
> >>>> - cosmetic changes (indents, getting rid of  "? 1 : 0" in
> >>>>   led_match_led_node())
> >>>>
> >>>> changes in v3:
> >>>> - dt binding: don't limit the brightness range to 0-255. Use the range of
> >>>>   the underlying LEDs. as a side-effect, all LEDs must now have the same
> >>>>   range
> >>>> - driver: Adapt to dt binding update.
> >>>> - driver: rework probe() for clarity and remove the remaining goto.
> >>>>
> >>>> changes in v2:
> >>>> - handle more than one LED.
> >>>> - don't make the backlight device a child of the LED controller.
> >>>> - make brightness-levels and default-brightness-level optional
> >>>> - removed the option to use a GPIO enable.
> >>>> - removed the option to use a regulator. It should be handled by the LED
> >>>>   core
> >>>> - don't make any change to the LED core (not needed anymore)
> >>>>
> >>>> Jean-Jacques Hiblot (2):
> >>>>   leds: Add managed API to get a LED from a device driver
> >>>>   dt-bindings: backlight: Add led-backlight binding
> >>>>
> >>>> Tomi Valkeinen (2):
> >>>>   leds: Add of_led_get() and led_put()
> >>>>   backlight: add led-backlight driver
> >>>>
> >>>>  .../bindings/leds/backlight/led-backlight.txt |  28 ++
> >>>>  drivers/leds/led-class.c                      |  92 ++++++
> >>>>  drivers/video/backlight/Kconfig               |   7 +
> >>>>  drivers/video/backlight/Makefile              |   1 +
> >>>>  drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c              | 268 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  include/linux/leds.h                          |   6 +
> >>>>  6 files changed, 402 insertions(+)
> >>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/led-backlight.txt
> >>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> For the whole set:
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Lee - we need to create immutable branch for this set since there will
> >>> be some interfering changes in the LED core in this cycle.
> >>>
> >>> I can create the branch and send the pull request once we will
> >>> obtain the ack from Rob for DT bindings, unless you have other
> >>> preference.
> >>
> >> We also require a review to be conducted by Daniel Thompson.
> >>
> >> After which, an immutable branch sounds like a good idea.  I'd like to
> >> create this myself if you don't mind.
> > 
> > Sure, thanks.
> 
> Unfortunately that hasn't happened and it will miss 5.4 merge window.
> 
> Daniel, we need your ack for this patch set.

Sorry for dropping the ball here.

I'm afraid I couldn't ack since I spotted a bug but I have shared
review feedback now!


Daniel.