Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:39:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:38:57 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:44548 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:38:50 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: rdtsc to mili secs? Date: 10 Nov 2000 13:38:16 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: <8uhps8$1tm$1@cesium.transmeta.com> In-Reply-To: <3A078C65.B3C146EC@mira.net> <20001110154254.A33@bug.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2000 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <20001110154254.A33@bug.ucw.cz> By author: Pavel Machek In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > Sensibly configured power saving/speed throttle systems do not change the > > frequency at all. The duty cycle is changed and this controls the cpu > > performance but the tsc is constant > > Do you have an example of notebook that does powersaving like that? > I have 2 examples of notebooks with changing TSC speed... > Intel PIIX-based systems will do duty-cycle throttling, for example. However, there are definitely notebooks that will mess with the frequency. At Transmeta, we went through some considerable pain to make sure RDTSC would count walltime even across Longrun transitions. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/