Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:11:10 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m_=28VMware=29?= 
        <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        pv-drivers@vmware.com, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix SEV user-space mapping of unencrypted
 coherent memory
Message-ID: <20190910061110.GA10968@infradead.org>
References: <20190905103541.4161-1-thomas_os@shipmail.org>
 <20190905112311.GA10199@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190905112311.GA10199@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 04:23:11AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This looks fine from the DMA POV.  I'll let the x86 guys comment on the
> rest.

Do we want to pick this series up for 5.4?  Should I queue it up in
the dma-mapping tree?