Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp5984796ybe; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAyFgIEfAwhkjbYAgRVlQWXdFh/NbWABvDT1FrCzoQgxmmURezdSjnMlRCYmPWfIPXOf2K X-Received: by 2002:a50:d6db:: with SMTP id l27mr32773681edj.164.1568141092521; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568141092; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J7DAQ+ob/8m50FhJGmk6owr3hX1ZO6dS7+sKzUfEeBm0+VneWVQzdujJYSb2HYuDl4 rM9KWHn4BWYSmx31P91rukVvQeAjtYAjV/x/jHo2hfQNNAB2I5F71T0wwZy5dLepVNfi el0uBDhC//yBWyeCcPHgr/83hXnp/Ys3EXKpjTRttSPvmHE5SRyr4GQyD11El+MdMRr9 p3JV95axpTLw8Pyz6W/m164m2addqnwt2Czk+ENnm9qrYaMVAIu47vdJvzaAqFiYpeB2 ueqT8cSKKm7oghuwLPU7fDbnR7pmYGyWKyKoTK70V8nI5P/7ESyb8yeKNdzKPHaH28aj arHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-filter; bh=OjJbkVvJtWKAKs0zGgD9P6B61uOF8AamPj10WvE8w0U=; b=zgU/IgrFQf9FEdZyjAsecbrAvPVQ58DMoUzjYM1QneuPxCbcRupWFwG+6y/jZYkEkB 0GYMWaMZNhj+Gej9JZE7cjILonaC8xAZPN3SAPA4cJWtWVejtK3R4SxmiJtVX4IRWMGu BGAWkhYi15/I76S6+11LPB+z5zXJVEtg5Hrhlt3xQ1QNJmhx1XijTXC4DtPtB5x8T4Og u+OxxXB4ug+ElBxdL2U5TMBwDCzL7sAFgPlnAptnomz1ThbKVtW/32N4EOBZz/laORiY ZsG/lEt22CG3iM13dA+n54LrGYkpIgyJJYpFWQ09qE8H7ZNXaGWF4I4U5W4ji1YPb7hM /fmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p13si8664766edx.162.2019.09.10.11.44.28; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731719AbfIIXTA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:19:00 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:50680 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726474AbfIIXTA (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:19:00 -0400 Received: from [10.200.156.146] (unknown [167.220.2.18]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FAD420B7186; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:18:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 5FAD420B7186 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Carry ima measurement log for arm64 via kexec_file_load To: Mimi Zohar , Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org References: <20190829200532.13545-1-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> <20190829200532.13545-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> <87r252kxc8.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> <0c7453d4-620d-2d98-3fda-f902b18da535@linux.microsoft.com> <1567985476.4614.224.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: prsriva Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:18:59 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1567985476.4614.224.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/8/19 4:31 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > Hi Prakhar, > "Carrying over the ima log during kexec_file_load" was originally > posted on 5/10 and 5/31 without a cover letter. On 8/29 it was > reposted as an RFC with a cover letter.  The cover letter was v1, but > the patch itself was not.  In the future, please use the "git format- > patch "-subject-prefix" option to add the version number to both the > cover letter and the patches. > > The comments you received were based on the 8/29 version.  I haven't > seen anything after that. > > Mimi Added the correct subject prefix, resent patches. I resent the patches sent at 5/31, since i had no response. v1 version addresses the comments in the RFC patch. I have cc-ed you to the email, hopefully its not missed again. Thankyou for pointing it out. Thanks, Prakhar Srivastava