Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750801AbVLYIHN (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:07:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750806AbVLYIHN (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:07:13 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.203]:29503 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750801AbVLYIHL (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 03:07:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IWGe/j9GPns4qNc3srogLm/V/H7f2qRq+DqJTh6pynOcAQnIZ38R6HBwmXwOuNOPBfPt0bZAa7ZF91hfmF0L0SdEnxIEAqNvXovwih5owX0EAzqIzBpLodSHL7+N5Fd6tzCi0CjaKFlAjMP/gpp2LnV4fKz2uKP6CvrFNq3nQT0= Message-ID: <43AE52B6.1090604@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:05:10 +0200 From: Alon Bar-Lev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051015) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luke-Jr CC: Lee Revell , David Wagner , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Question] LinuxThreads, setuid - Is there user mode hook? References: <200512222312.jBMNCj96018554@taverner.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <1135370197.22177.40.camel@mindpipe> <20051223203347.GA32589@nevyn.them.org> <200512250131.19218.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: <200512250131.19218.luke@dashjr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1078 Lines: 29 Luke-Jr wrote: > On Friday 23 December 2005 20:33, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >>Applications have to run on existing platforms and work with existing >>software, as I'm sure you know. If someone anywhere in the food chain >>isn't ready for NPTL, a project can easily be stuck with LT for another >>few years. > > > Not sure about NPTL support in non-Linux-based operating systems (Solaris, > BSD, etc), but I'd be surprised if they supported LinuxThreads. Thus, > shouldn't NPTL really result in a *more* portable application? > Yes... This is my first recommendation... But what if the user does not want to upgrade? Well... I understand that I am left with the following options: 1. upgrade to NPTL 2. My implementation of querying the main in a separate thread. 3. don't use setuid Thank you for your help, Alon Bar-Lev. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/