Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@hpe.com>,
        Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@hpe.com>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20190905130252.590161292@stormcage.eag.rdlabs.hpecorp.net>
 <CANiq72nTKbNEKezoy_CqdFRuQ0SD2OsORV8u=i_1g=2atkCRiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <797654d8-562a-6492-79e1-65a292157d04@hpe.com>
 <20190910164050.GH23931@zn.tnic>
From:   Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Message-ID: <ba26a8c1-26e7-fb88-9466-76ba35404a05@hpe.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:57:39 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190910164050.GH23931@zn.tnic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 9/10/2019 9:40 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>> Hi,  I'm not conscientiously adding any attachments.  I think what is
>> happening is some email readers mistake the '---' to signify an attachment
>> follows.  I see the "staple" symbol on some indicating an attachment, but
>> not usually all of the email I send.  Thanks, Mike
> 
> Btw, is there anyway to fix your mail setup and not flood with your
> patchset?
> 
> I have received your V2 patchset 5(!) times yesterday and today. All
> separate submissions!
> 
> ;-(
> 

Sorry, I've been testing them and monitoring LKML to check for leakages. 
  I certainly did not intend for any of those test sends to get out. 
And I don't understand right now how they did.  I am using sendmail in 
it's basic form and you or anyone else was not on the recipient list.

(Honestly, if I had known they got out, I would have stopped testing... 
:)  But the latest ones are obviously the "official" submissions, since 
those are the copies that I also have.)  If you accept them upstream, 
I'll quit sending them, I promise... :)