Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp6084457ybe; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwuQB2rUmpOXg8L1Ny5aKBVwgcUf+CZZf00MtsqtNttpXaNM9eUllLfWWK61lOs1HaGtNAf X-Received: by 2002:a50:d68a:: with SMTP id r10mr33069368edi.151.1568146581624; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568146581; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t6LEy2KZ4h9ynif5h2PcVF/2SI1EXsqaRUHLpAHj2gh/xWdanIRFh20zTAo8tNtKGp KXZ8dEH7Z+N20/if1SsvRrhryuKd5GqCRkY1mD79g7ynMLPYGdbf4HPDwLjKT+pRROR/ cinMEeelaoOrK+asXzKqnpRJ6jl/uZdQeAx0p9pgVGtyHSZYZJD+t2wXhkf2mZNduNr9 CMMs971BsDb6RzSb9ECXMQbwM56gBtZejFLjw6TIoc2LxD9sCRjf7d80w0Gk2Jl3jZ/z u8e64B+1uecEhBXTGfUpkV6IF9bnpCBC4Kwdn+Mdyrt4DJhlTSodEF/cRI3P54wa6+15 nWLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=vKjBadJZsVZtUGd3WVckVL2DIAFF4FA1DCNgRycmkBI=; b=gIrK371uvMj1Hfw1U4SccaWNcLI6tuhsC6lhZs2lAkB69akfr/dzDtMcICb5RuM7jM BONJ2F2i+abUa042agi/gXw2ZXNaNzUarKsstTAZljVKwBBiDuRPQkYq3VZeXDEMH5d0 kI6ep5nsC+fFCz4SzQFGzJTem55+wUTH0PGCXMKbf8aDUW3qmPyDD3p75ZQQT2HSwOCJ 3WayJ/40LPGp7J6KWIkv4nMJa050q5IyYKNQJDzfobrTdZpi6TC5W0BMqPZzl+fbgXs1 8j1kPvghysyT5GJjKLIf3wDr0P/MWYkmMSPjoMjyxjhSU2Q0yw9v8Z8BTryJZrGWmlsV Azrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b20si10881226edc.359.2019.09.10.13.15.56; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729472AbfIJNw5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:52:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39996 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726008AbfIJNw5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:52:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f199.google.com (mail-qt1-f199.google.com [209.85.160.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6454C049E32 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f199.google.com with SMTP id b1so19928313qtj.9 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:52:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=vKjBadJZsVZtUGd3WVckVL2DIAFF4FA1DCNgRycmkBI=; b=CMrZK/Fs87GSIpp4iKDxpSpPVAIvIKvm5bHh/nskF+/aRsxTgq+53yGfk5+NSYw0wx pYRVYjW170QSJ3pGDwU+O3ZaLlXkg/+3UAXxefWbkf73mPn7yp6ouKvjzctqW5h3g+qb tdw1Pj1vch/QUMXL8jMJZPYIvRx8ycJY6K1LbMsLbQ+KPVzk80SEshtY518WzvANZx1C CW5PttdbY7fdBG5bryTfagr9I88xq+5/9sC15rBdWLh14wQfBnate01N9zqbhHnpB2Ez 3O9f8jPOAm5LLLr2RCEdRw/Iqhd3r4dlek1DG2GrLBKs++W8E+2qIGe8dlHJu6edO1a8 AKHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9KGbMTbojNF4HPzfrnEzYdc3gxlEUfxbziDBYldjCkyK4RLUZ ZAILQGqkVPfwiEcWh+Xlc9DQQ4fiVKf5o2wyy0JnyzUu6q8+vM3gmSqy7STEIW+ZID+riay2CEP u5EQ2WQ3sR2OmiP5Mgn9Zh/yE X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e811:: with SMTP id y17mr7641986qvn.68.1568123575198; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:52:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e811:: with SMTP id y17mr7641951qvn.68.1568123574950; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([80.74.107.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n42sm10807604qta.31.2019.09.10.06.52.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:52:46 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com, idos@mellanox.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, haotian.wang@sifive.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] virtio: introudce a mdev based transport Message-ID: <20190910094807-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20190910081935.30516-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20190910081935.30516-4-jasowang@redhat.com> <20190910055744-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <572ffc34-3081-8503-d3cc-192edc9b5311@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <572ffc34-3081-8503-d3cc-192edc9b5311@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:13:02PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/9/10 下午6:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > +#ifndef _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H > > > +#define _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H > > > + > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > + > > > +/* > > > + * Ioctls > > > + */ > > Pls add a bit more content here. It's redundant to state these > > are ioctls. Much better to document what does each one do. > > > Ok. > > > > > > > + > > > +struct virtio_mdev_callback { > > > + irqreturn_t (*callback)(void *); > > > + void *private; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV 0xAF > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_SET_VQ_CALLBACK _IOW(VIRTIO_MDEV, 0x00, \ > > > + struct virtio_mdev_callback) > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_SET_CONFIG_CALLBACK _IOW(VIRTIO_MDEV, 0x01, \ > > > + struct virtio_mdev_callback) > > Function pointer in an ioctl parameter? How does this ever make sense? > > > I admit this is hacky (casting). > > > > And can't we use a couple of registers for this, and avoid ioctls? > > > Yes, how about something like interrupt numbers for each virtqueue and > config? Should we just reuse VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_XXX then? > > > > > > + > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_API_STRING "virtio-mdev" > > > + > > > +/* > > > + * Control registers > > > + */ > > > + > > > +/* Magic value ("virt" string) - Read Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_MAGIC_VALUE 0x000 > > > + > > > +/* Virtio device version - Read Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_VERSION 0x004 > > > + > > > +/* Virtio device ID - Read Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_ID 0x008 > > > + > > > +/* Virtio vendor ID - Read Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_VENDOR_ID 0x00c > > > + > > > +/* Bitmask of the features supported by the device (host) > > > + * (32 bits per set) - Read Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_FEATURES 0x010 > > > + > > > +/* Device (host) features set selector - Write Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_FEATURES_SEL 0x014 > > > + > > > +/* Bitmask of features activated by the driver (guest) > > > + * (32 bits per set) - Write Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DRIVER_FEATURES 0x020 > > > + > > > +/* Activated features set selector - Write Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DRIVER_FEATURES_SEL 0x024 > > > + > > > +/* Queue selector - Write Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_SEL 0x030 > > > + > > > +/* Maximum size of the currently selected queue - Read Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NUM_MAX 0x034 > > > + > > > +/* Queue size for the currently selected queue - Write Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NUM 0x038 > > > + > > > +/* Ready bit for the currently selected queue - Read Write */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_READY 0x044 > > Is this same as started? > > > Do you mean "status"? I really meant "enabled", didn't remember the correct name. As in: VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE > > > > > > + > > > +/* Alignment of virtqueue - Read Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_ALIGN 0x048 > > > + > > > +/* Queue notifier - Write Only */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_NOTIFY 0x050 > > > + > > > +/* Device status register - Read Write */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_STATUS 0x060 > > > + > > > +/* Selected queue's Descriptor Table address, 64 bits in two halves */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_DESC_LOW 0x080 > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_DESC_HIGH 0x084 > > > + > > > +/* Selected queue's Available Ring address, 64 bits in two halves */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_AVAIL_LOW 0x090 > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_AVAIL_HIGH 0x094 > > > + > > > +/* Selected queue's Used Ring address, 64 bits in two halves */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_USED_LOW 0x0a0 > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_QUEUE_USED_HIGH 0x0a4 > > > + > > > +/* Configuration atomicity value */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_CONFIG_GENERATION 0x0fc > > > + > > > +/* The config space is defined by each driver as > > > + * the per-driver configuration space - Read Write */ > > > +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_CONFIG 0x100 > > Mixing device and generic config space is what virtio pci did, > > caused lots of problems with extensions. > > It would be better to reserve much more space. > > > I see, will do this. > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > + > > > +#endif > > > + > > > + > > > +/* Ready bit for the currently selected queue - Read Write */ > > > -- > > > 2.19.1