Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp873984ybe; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:09:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzF5VhCyou4U9WnG3u65I1ASgSN+SNkkb32OyIoN+JGoYzno+2QMNhn1TEkk+FsVz3G1jrN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:53c1:: with SMTP id p1mr29372421ejo.227.1568207363977; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:09:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568207363; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gaXTGqDtK2MvLvxLRncXrV25uciggmM6DxoRD2TgY1pHqr1LMWLJAMP7T/eqxSBVQn sUPEwVKYVQABRHXMXRFlqMDas0xQ995S873yBG5ICX/Qxy/qMHRbgofAtlSFQCom2UR8 aNPYe63345mWers5dhwsSmswaLK90HJtLxXS8doMvnd61fRzG3qsInIOvowIQMW/+3qC ULYv2AGlx8S9wcTx+mjfkw4YJNfJM8P4gyCDWeoua0gpu8Z2UekSko6vhuD5mqKk8R/m A6/OHERE7amaCX5d4qVhXxclTkEB1W2JhmUcROFCuDa40b02mnxAs/UQnOZzu1KU4zSl aoZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=vM9T7JPTYaG7Q5phhjKWs9t8a740OJg6gDLyXdDlwy0=; b=UgO2HB1boUhBSQw5r5Ffu4frFUu6vRMeCjuf/Apio1RDDe+j3Zld7iOh37XXM6ndKB X2WYVL+oFoCfWyqj0MTELsUXNxJ5hhB0p5yHg8TJ/odCkrs00/GjUWD1ECshUcOSWZ1d ONz1mTrpdvamIQNtoc8JXH66lZ/mshimpg7Krl0eknfE8tpaUuwImmfk/8r2dgzXDfRS bmVB1GA3krRj3QdSYyybu3g4RvxfSe0ygvcoTTXlk1t7f6ltSFBcIZst/zRRhflFKy+z zu8l2hqDrv0SgDd1u7Z++1k4s3DZhidJ8KCQeYl2yXXqjA38K2X6HjFVKSxpfiQKixCk gGUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="I5Enin/5"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z43si13046367edc.389.2019.09.11.06.08.59; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="I5Enin/5"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727993AbfIKNG4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:06:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:51491 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727837AbfIKNGz (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:06:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 7so3413926wme.1 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:06:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vM9T7JPTYaG7Q5phhjKWs9t8a740OJg6gDLyXdDlwy0=; b=I5Enin/54z24EJiVGsjC9LBUp7DWLfqpIT7jKxNc6AR3TZtq81lDcq13DBQttTGJt7 vPD2PNtx66V200oc3BMwabrgL3o4m/cJQ1ehNZoSv90Cf06sRMjziKVZW+ZH9PrvrYil gZxsW2TCCQswOahMWFtcHYYUlNy3su48MsoLV7kJSeaD760lYOsF1xCX+/H4NxwRVwe/ 6LLzQTDo+lYiyVXTbC/SdEoieE4oehs91mafDcPNdHvDHI+RVpOA2SwCNwfY+4hHMHjg LYqggun0YLgEr+dbnodTJAfx6Wr8E8XdZ7AgsXnaI+MKJcx+PGxz9fanOhjcsWILwS9O qvFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vM9T7JPTYaG7Q5phhjKWs9t8a740OJg6gDLyXdDlwy0=; b=JozFADulTbESisZ3KZoCOY0ts0flMd65MOpcm+sBqfv7CzArZ93lx/CRjFbWK86YuA WaRnicVbm+GcGr0/97n9B7EvUiKys82mBJUxDNYHUjNQ7Ww8MXjRqb5PqkkuGZCqph8I wLyRFAusqh9bmrFeHN0fNgQP3BYprrrx8okSDkDxpKLDFy00X4/jqBXM+hprqjfOgIx0 BMuN78/bv/dEFhipcqe1lMFZ/xF0FmOs8gXkb+JPMgqcrgXNoE6z8R+Njp2eTlJQEkK/ b56w7RtUghCNaNYLbDjrStwNGOXk/xOVDheopub3q7eGyrMs1btUO5xu+g4XQWvFqLFy 7/nA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUMx4sNb1UDx6pf4JZQfLCaVtX3b/v4PoeDhSyOpnLP6IKcgLPc pabAOKS8KkhQlPZcqpfpAwNiCwu83/fuxAagr30= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2047:: with SMTP id p7mr4157887wmg.13.1568207213658; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 06:06:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190830215910.31590-1-daniel.baluta@nxp.com> <20190906012938.GB17926@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> <20190911110017.GA2036@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20190911110017.GA2036@sirena.org.uk> From: Daniel Baluta Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:06:41 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Implement set_bclk_ratio To: Mark Brown Cc: Nicolin Chen , Linux-ALSA , Timur Tabi , Xiubo Li , Daniel Baluta , "S.j. Wang" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , NXP Linux Team , Viorel Suman , Fabio Estevam Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:01 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:29:39PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 12:59:10AM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > > > > This is to allow machine drivers to set a certain bitclk rate > > > which might not be exactly rate * frame size. > > > Just a quick thought of mine: slot_width and slots could be > > set via set_dai_tdm_slot() actually, while set_bclk_ratio() > > would override that one with your change. I'm not sure which > > one could be more important...so would you mind elaborating > > your use case? > > The reason we have both operations is partly that some hardware > can configure the ratio but not do TDM and partly that setting > TDM slots forces us to configure the slot size depending on the > current stream configuration while just setting the ratio means > we can just fix the configuration once. I'd say it's just a user > error to try to do both simultaneously. Yes, exactly. We wanted to have a better control of bclk freq. Sorry for the late answer, I'm traveling.