Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp960305ybe; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwsN0vAEkCb+WFp51RMK0UFk0as/IfwsWEMsUQN5PjlPCBcI9yfDm2UB9MbrLtpsa4XsKPm X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:41e5:: with SMTP id nb5mr29976863ejb.91.1568211650236; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568211650; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rf9IV80q3aWse1yqez7dn27/ZbbptFYOlh6/sSAYf98pT57hVK82TFPbUIvECy8VM9 a/DITJqFM5an+fq5BeTf5eNxeNwnVvxNwxVx9pQFMuFO/5J0s3fscheuA50JBeizfzED NJuO1xVwMNpSd/wCQ/WK69/W80Sse1vxsh63zDgMj6uj/lH394W0qMf5Z8POMB28twNW pATxgWkPWNIPIA3alujzc9vv6cUaTq+boGJkBGzfCcsuf+m51yt/u7ad0M7FMyDHMiby HKH9Gn3EZBxEqKsHZb1jf6q3qIj+1kykaqBr2WNf/0CaMHSMB8G6b9P0GlUuLacetfZ0 CTdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bz1mSsuTl+E4vAwMyWtdro8hF2w1GwA4uT5lSquTwhw=; b=b+yYbZaQ1mVLn3Kme/HdKuqFtqtBrdQzhM1M634fIo6zUT/bp05N3Ly/Avn6jny+xw XGEXCWZBf/aN0C+jMX+6MFQDm6GL9SO2GaUQ9PQ7rycGAZEg6Fy3QPJ9iA1CvDpAj+x4 M98Mpe9OTDG5NWRlbDxfmBhV4/qs1gWtDsQlddWhn90ZjmwDcMHX961Tb3+pE47mWdId 2+14NEyO4JJZdquTOMKPHaCvvzgAKeB0fZcZI0ObQeBFz3i2tjsh/HkMd5/53D4a/wI8 8OJlMKP291sJZ/O9kxdSzPDzF3sZA4R2Tfl9jD60Ia5CGe/UBCzzhdKRcw5TTBZJXB/T uAlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XP5xHqZ7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si11675797ejj.37.2019.09.11.07.20.26; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XP5xHqZ7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728110AbfIKOQf (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:16:35 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:42450 "EHLO mail-qk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726341AbfIKOQf (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:16:35 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id f13so20923089qkm.9; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:16:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bz1mSsuTl+E4vAwMyWtdro8hF2w1GwA4uT5lSquTwhw=; b=XP5xHqZ7xOlRXj7HOW4YfjSKWQCcUqBQprIziluIiQnuAsTEkzCybcB7fFfJm27yPR GDds5yZIiLTxvxACCXmb197OBE3R2vYBFbX5oUURMbg2GGKciF0uxI85nxPNfswKjMSJ W0LYPjiH0p1Z6JT+dM8YBJOmfnn360bKFYmhkBPKstBRfZBnC9kt+Jn6sOkTNkutXH65 /3JoF0p9BKrGEW2kPfjAkiwAPxJyIapUHhtb2UtDTYd7m2R18FXNoDQX7EiN8uvrfeaY m6jQPJfEBMe0sY3RlHXJKhkxcJ2G52HBucA1bVupG1GNaLxpC5whk5FvSs6tN/1JwvTL mz5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bz1mSsuTl+E4vAwMyWtdro8hF2w1GwA4uT5lSquTwhw=; b=GZyPR5TpcteGzat3Yb8Xwr9/sMVUbZ4lm60BEK2n5M/nvqKk/NAi4maLuhtntQq0ID fnMwQN/yKhIJUMsuJ0+aZPHkT6TFWI0j7bKIhdj4OlIEUqZGa9+MUKViS1z7giXuMdOX Dv9AzbSCNwQlvpJNkKDNfnbYvvBPDp+4pxVTNBVTU89D9zyGdhVOHQErPwAIlTPO2WoT WNGixiZ/1pg6ERnz8ax85eqi909t5xNYd7Yj1L8X5ezAR+lKn9obLcWb77Dnpr7BiZMy gh0qGl8lBncn0aj/T+GIXzrWmBIQTFTpXVpFtx2GC5FV/Iv83mI+mIrT4wel1owgDH63 ++4w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAxiz8uMkCST/4s8RJW8DiubtyrIVxnJJJFrOt7AqRzuqUKLLy /Qj1xNqcvcsqZE700c1lbMQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a3cc:: with SMTP id m195mr34540776qke.443.1568211393921; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:500::1:8b2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u23sm10041210qkm.49.2019.09.11.07.16.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:16:30 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Paolo Valente Cc: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Johannes Weiner , clm@fb.com, dennisz@fb.com, newella@fb.com, Li Zefan , Jens Axboe , Josef Bacik , Josef Bacik , kernel-team@fb.com, Rik van Riel , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] blkcg: implement blk-iocost Message-ID: <20190911141630.GV2263813@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> References: <20190828220600.2527417-1-tj@kernel.org> <20190828220600.2527417-9-tj@kernel.org> <20190910125513.GA6399@blackbody.suse.cz> <20190910160855.GS2263813@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:18:53AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: > > The two being enabled at the same time doesn't make sense, so we can > > just switch over to bfq when bfq is selected as the iosched. I asked > > what Paolo wanted to do in terms of interface a couple times now but > > didn't get an answer and he posted a patch which makes the two > > controllers conflict, so.... Paolo, so it looks like you want to > > rename all bfq files to drop the bfq prefix, right? > > Yep, mainly because ... this is the solution you voted and you > yourself proposed [1] :) > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10988261/ So, that was then. Since then the interface change has been published and userspace, at least some of them, already had to adjust. Now, I don't have any opinion on the matter and flipping again will cause inconveniences to some subset of users. It's your call. > > I can implement > > the switching if so. > > That would be perfect. Whichever way it gets decided, this is easy enough. I'll prep a patch. Thanks. -- tejun