Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc 2.31 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C
 startup and thread creation (v12)
To:     Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
        libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org
References: <20190807142726.2579-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
 <20190807142726.2579-2-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
 <8736h2sn8y.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <7db64714-3dc5-b322-1edc-736b08ee7d63@redhat.com>
 <87ef0mr6qj.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
From:   Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <4a6f6326-ea82-e031-0fe0-7263ed97e797@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:45:14 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87ef0mr6qj.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
> 
>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
> 
> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
> still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications.

Which work is this? Do you have a URL reference to WIP?

> (We have something that should work for us as long as we can get large
> machines from the lab, but I agree that it's not very useful if glibc
> bot-cycle time is roughly one business day.)

Yeah, we have to discuss how to accelerate this.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.