Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()"
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
References: <20190830231527.22304-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <20190912221927.18641-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <CANiq72n_KxKGwrN4onWotocTuZjVSAqENF_5Pk9t1-pk7NDrgQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Message-ID: <d47740cc-a373-91a9-df33-d2def69a370d@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:11:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72n_KxKGwrN4onWotocTuZjVSAqENF_5Pk9t1-pk7NDrgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 13/09/2019 00.30, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:19 AM Rasmus Villemoes
> <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>>
>> Patch 1 has already been picked up by Greg in staging-next, it's
>> included here for completeness. I don't know how to route the rest, or
>> if they should simply wait for 5.5 given how close we are to the merge
>> window for 5.4.
> 
> If you want I can pick this up in compiler-attributes and submit it as
> a whole if we get Acks from rtl8723bs/x86/...maintainers.

Ingo has now acked the x86 parts, and Greg has already picked up the
rtl8723bs patch, which is at least an implicit ack. I'm just unsure of
how and if it will work if you also pick up that one - but, if you
don't, your tree would be (somewhat) dependent on Greg's staging-next :(

Rasmus