Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
To:     Nikolaus Voss <nv@vosn.de>
CC:     "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
        "Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
        "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>,
        "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ferry Toth <ftoth@telfort.nl>,
        "nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de" 
        <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPICA: make acpi_load_table() return table index
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] ACPICA: make acpi_load_table() return table index
Thread-Index: AQHVaUE6M44QnoJV0UqVXW85SrAmnKcoFnTQgAGaZwD///c2gA==
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:20:21 +0000
Message-ID: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E3B967ADF6@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <20190906174605.GY2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20190912080742.24642-1-nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de>
 <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E3B9679CE8@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1909130911180.20316@fox.voss.local>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1909130911180.20316@fox.voss.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.2.0.6
dlp-reaction: no-action
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


-----Original Message-----
From: Nikolaus Voss [mailto:nv@vosn.de] 
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 12:44 AM
To: Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>; Schmauss, Erik <erik.schmauss@intel.com>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>; Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>; Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>; Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ferry Toth <ftoth@telfort.nl>; nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPICA: make acpi_load_table() return table index

Bob,

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Moore, Robert wrote:
> The ability to unload an ACPI table (especially AML tables such as
> SSDTs) is in the process of being deprecated in ACPICA -- since it is 
> also deprecated in the current ACPI specification. This is being done 
> because of the difficulty of deleting the namespace entries for the 
> table.  FYI, Windows does not properly support this function either.

ok, I see it can be a problem to unload an AML table with all it's consequences e.g. with respect to driver unregistering in setups with complex dependencies. It will only work properly under certain conditions
- nevertheless acpi_tb_unload_table() is still exported in ACPICA and we should get this working as it worked before.

AcpiTbUnloadTable is not exported, it is an internal interface only -- as recognized by the "AcpiTb". I'm not sure that I want to change the interface to AcpiLoadTable just for something that is being deprecated. Already, we throw an ACPI_EXCEPTION if the Unload operator is encountered in the AML byte stream. The same thing with AcpiUnloadParentTable - it is being deprecated.


    ACPI_EXCEPTION ((AE_INFO, AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED,
        "AML Unload operator is not supported"));


The API change I request is not directly related to table unloading, it's just that the index of the loaded table is returned for future reference:

[...]

>> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpixf.h b/include/acpi/acpixf.h index 
>> 3845c8fcc94e5..c90bbdc4146a6 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/acpixf.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/acpixf.h
>> @@ -452,7 +452,8 @@ ACPI_EXTERNAL_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status ACPI_INIT_FUNCTION
>> 					       u8 physical))
>>
>> ACPI_EXTERNAL_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>> -			    acpi_load_table(struct acpi_table_header *table))
>> +			    acpi_load_table(struct acpi_table_header *table,
>> +					    u32 *table_idx))
>>
>> ACPI_EXTERNAL_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
>> 			    acpi_unload_parent_table(acpi_handle object))
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>

This allows for a simple fix of the regression and doesn't imply future support for table unloading. Would this be acceptable?

Niko