Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:21:17 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] make use of gcc 9's "asm inline()"
Message-ID: <20190913152117.GA458892@kroah.com>
References: <20190830231527.22304-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <20190912221927.18641-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <CANiq72n_KxKGwrN4onWotocTuZjVSAqENF_5Pk9t1-pk7NDrgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <d47740cc-a373-91a9-df33-d2def69a370d@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d47740cc-a373-91a9-df33-d2def69a370d@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 08:11:24AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 13/09/2019 00.30, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:19 AM Rasmus Villemoes
> > <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >> Patch 1 has already been picked up by Greg in staging-next, it's
> >> included here for completeness. I don't know how to route the rest, or
> >> if they should simply wait for 5.5 given how close we are to the merge
> >> window for 5.4.
> > 
> > If you want I can pick this up in compiler-attributes and submit it as
> > a whole if we get Acks from rtl8723bs/x86/...maintainers.
> 
> Ingo has now acked the x86 parts, and Greg has already picked up the
> rtl8723bs patch, which is at least an implicit ack. I'm just unsure of
> how and if it will work if you also pick up that one - but, if you
> don't, your tree would be (somewhat) dependent on Greg's staging-next :(

Feel free to also take that patch through any tree, it's "obviously
correct" :)

greg k-h