Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp2083461ybe; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:34:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyembxs2yB5zy13XQmPs24oH2fRwc92ykPcrnLTql9nfo6XuPWZXwhwDpXSjaZSyUatt2wf X-Received: by 2002:a50:eb81:: with SMTP id y1mr52497631edr.216.1568471658804; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:34:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568471658; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BiFEAHsS4s+rl33M6hLy2LMetpojxtislS3NCuOuiwuyvZzdgfwngKF6jDAw2KjYy2 GrVP4XbuBijPaPGMD97sUQSQLsTo2JkdX/j5B4CP1Ij8sCRoRy/uMVboCLvqvAljpJTL YUMbclsMpws6K1waWFCU+McGJkAoIgUJC3fPzNCImExZfww/ZY0UivBn02fpIu73D/Wz dSQ7GCB5p7mbq6S2UMt1TQI9RgWgzBx+j+MbZ2yMJgoO6U90OrFzBCOqHcmt/UNN3Mlm hhHODfSc4klQWDaLjbhFhCdV2QHkN7NkiWbiawpogw9tTlo6i46VoRIM5W6erIUKdIYL 5ARg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=GZS0eMO5E5zSRugyeXgeD/cE6Edijnu4rZNFSWVvyE8=; b=gwjBZ3OxxrDXvHJj5kmgqIGxtKrLNdiBhbZOJzPyqyEk4tEhbIED1M0VNERtHJtHNt ByZcSwjq7NuvwuNixjvR2+rHuf/Pbu9o/9k+dbRXaAz84kMGIIoT0oav0awpSowNTj7g v+LwXw5HVJ7keGaqxIUCsN73Y/QYhySWPKBq90yEOj2Tw2ZvJ7qS/Vl5CMylCklu5XTc A3yO2933oIm1ShYl/88NM6UYVEeCqd0SJbXYy5Il3owv+lr40BM7UjmGy/P6bQFSl0Vz BpMDjQXUETQI+gtZj+XtaSq/5O0kwkNJI40TJl/5pvQLc/mN4s3V6Vl9R8qjDGKJQ4gS 1JTQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=K548ZTJE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14si19451893edc.81.2019.09.14.07.33.55; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 07:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=K548ZTJE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390333AbfINAbR (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 20:31:17 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:35755 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388296AbfINAbR (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 20:31:17 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id n4so16128538pgv.2 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:31:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GZS0eMO5E5zSRugyeXgeD/cE6Edijnu4rZNFSWVvyE8=; b=K548ZTJEQ6iFC5z3YdwevITK1iNbgK/vue1InwebFMKHAUjYrEnTWfspcXJ6hGnwaS EGC8rQNV84p6P01VsYPZfaJyg3QJvjbVyfpJCuZCeoCgnOPlnKOU9A6IHwvthZbYJeib A/gg6kOGvOCoKuo+Zrk3B4GaU0DeB2d0PBZK3UwB1hgYW2XlUf4U5uYM4W75bYpGZzdE s02D4+6c6XwU8bbIR0bINDp6B0JMKQFWqoYF57rKupI2gT4Co+PdQubLPAtXFzsdhKe4 jMB8/5Bjr24fZOn1D8eQ7VP0SvulhIki2bR1ugBynhWwx4nO9b0OoU6x5OOCoHX7pnWa ztJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GZS0eMO5E5zSRugyeXgeD/cE6Edijnu4rZNFSWVvyE8=; b=W0u5B3ApOyQ0WwxCl6Hiq/fGYYcIU5mY35HbFN+rJkqYGHZ23hPCZkS+I6KNFIC8dN /1Aw9rrAh2uXazM2FA4QbL80tBLSYUxg/Wzx7+7NoP9u4fhQNDJ9F7iIbOWL2hP1UWKQ BKZlqRGI3dZMxOLgRz5aXBgDRfLkimDu06GMdcWu5E3iy2fBwnWiWPaFtsoENjn1MALu c64WDbvPhyu44nSgF4zvF6spC2CBdwX5qqiqWyR2DPayxEg0SeMAoffq5iqmNtY8zHGc PZnJWvXenxpc3bAQgfsCTQ2C1iAzVihcAoOyiYesJIveC22YVoYmOYhf+x7S+Px4K9QP CECQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9ZpiZXLm+wrNFYuKW+HSbqyg30TbS7DLtfp/MBnT6sxP/IGY+ tjvD1wxN7YiIC/gRAPB59NFXspXgD7gOAQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:be13:: with SMTP id a19mr189147pjs.55.1568421074785; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:100e:83a1:4d1e:aad2:f066:c964? ([2605:e000:100e:83a1:4d1e:aad2:f066:c964]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16sm2222389pgb.84.2019.09.13.17.31.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Optimise io_uring completion waiting To: "Pavel Begunkov (Silence)" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:31:11 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/13/19 4:28 PM, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote: > From: Pavel Begunkov > > There could be a lot of overhead within generic wait_event_*() used for > waiting for large number of completions. The patchset removes much of > it by using custom wait event (wait_threshold). > > Synthetic test showed ~40% performance boost. (see patch 2) Nifty, from an io_uring perspective, I like this a lot. The core changes needed to support it look fine as well. I'll await Peter/Ingo's comments on it. -- Jens Axboe