Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190909150957.12abe684@endymion>
References: <20190909150957.12abe684@endymion> <20190906130221.0b47a565@endymion> <20190906121510.GA17328@kroah.com>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Thomas <trenn@suse.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: /dev/mem and secure boot
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5357.1568626704.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:38:24 +0100
Message-ID: <5358.1568626704@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:

> I wrongly assumed it had been merged upstream meanwhile but I was
> wrong. David, any reason why this didn't happen?

There were last-minute objections.

The patches got redesigned somewhat by Matthew Garrett and are now pending
pulling once again:

	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/alpine.LRH.2.21.1909101402230.20291@namei.org/T/#u

> Out of curiosity, are these patches in RHEL kernels?

Fedora, yes, my patchset; RHEL-7 and RHEL-8, no.

David