Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 16:16:11 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
cc:     Ben Luo <luoben@linux.alibaba.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        tao.ma@linux.alibaba.com, gerry@linux.alibaba.com,
        nanhai.zou@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] genirq/vfio: Introduce irq_update_devid() and
 optimize VFIO irq ops
In-Reply-To: <20190913114452.5e05d8c4@x1.home>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1909161615230.1887@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <cover.1567394624.git.luoben@linux.alibaba.com> <abb4080f-dfe2-1882-4bde-51bb7e660d4a@linux.alibaba.com> <20190913114452.5e05d8c4@x1.home>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Alex Williamson wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:30:16 +0800
> Ben Luo <luoben@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
> > A friendly reminder.
> 
> The vfio patch looks ok to me.  Thomas, do you have further comments or
> a preference on how to merge these?  I'd tend to prefer the vfio
> changes through my branch for testing and can pull the irq changes with
> your approval, but we could do the reverse or split them and I could
> follow with the vfio change once the irq changes are in mainline.

I can provide you a branch, once I looked again at that stuff. It's
somewhere in that huge conference induced backlog.

Thanks,

	tglx