Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:32:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:31:58 -0400 Received: from [216.151.155.121] ([216.151.155.121]:10513 "EHLO belphigor.mcnaught.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:31:48 -0400 To: Stephen Torri Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Memory free report error (kernel-2.4.10-ac10) In-Reply-To: From: Doug McNaught Date: 10 Oct 2001 16:32:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: Stephen Torri's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:10:58 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 31 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Torri writes: > I have installed and used kernel-2.4.10-ac10 on a SMP system (Dual P3) > using 768 MB Ram. Yet on startup of the system (RedHat 7.0), the system > resources are almost all used. Here are the files started: > > Here is the report of the memory (free -m): > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 751 662 89 0 564 18 > -/+ buffers/cache: 78 672 > Swap: 133 0 133 Unless I'm missing something, this is completely normal. You're using 78M of memory once buffers are factored out. Seems reasonable for a just-started system. For comparison, here's a moderately loaded machine running 2.2.19: [doug@scooby doug]$ free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 505 480 24 137 42 278 -/+ buffers/cache: 159 345 Swap: 101 0 101 Are you actually seeing performance problems or are you just worried about the 'free' output? -Doug -- Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees. --T. J. Jackson, 1863 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/