Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp4570319ybe; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxsGgmZn/VzfXRCjjg4hDu6tIuVZVkIhNYrelIpjznYdM+EDeLy7zWrn4zKSVobYDWLvCa3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6c7:: with SMTP id v7mr2003022ejb.27.1568669988674; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568669988; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mI2tsZvVcmID4Qha2+s0zC6eYxC+yIDl1RrBZ++yEARFcaemlYc+ToWiF1SkoN94ir AMYE9J4iOZIJCQuFgE/B6wpTxNaHPpz5kQvp/EQiR1ujUQaRDdl2JmPEzfXzo55QeBTG m5vgequSeD0yF6AaaAusgCrrCrwD6juDRTfj3o9xiOwW/FPsgdwRtquTCiC6nXank7YQ 6jW+7WwYE9WLPErUfewd2NhVeDaZJ7r5t9to09y1tTWs7Mu/lPyERIA49AQrxuJVuMUt IjT70HZakQdoCHkyLXOmezcHI5XceCbowFuloaQY5L7T0AcLYwFCaz5JLgVjqZh+yaMa m8xQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:mime-version:organization :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=hGusYGs5CH31CEu0H2wbmqipEI9oaLbDQ13S5CVPxM0=; b=g/5IK0vuMpEwHPNtVqzrCnzPS5mebw1/dxp6pN8BGr6KZB2qsvXigM2qsZR7QYYDF2 PjyvWaTu+arNz1YiEgKcvpUghsg/m0a8i8oxwbJKHMlZZKYBQy+waJ1VPlR2ri+2gvvP KT6r2DxjplPdDjcT0c3S8oAdk8AWzOSB8qiRf19SPC0c+EgUVkRByoiUfHhWKy06fsVt QXYwXdLNv6F2zZihI0ag6KVG5wiDGvjMzEiF1nY2XraHqWTMY4nLqEddLs8n628A2R+d vKZcV+3y1HT7fEbGVwZ3M45HwvR2P4ZuVy23ZLSCZfsVfmHuh0DPrBpNJcywET084Z/s flPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h90si214262edd.178.2019.09.16.14.39.25; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388372AbfIPRx2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:53:28 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:34334 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388252AbfIPRx2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:53:28 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8GHb6qD016863 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:53:18 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v2dbgc8xh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:53:17 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:53:15 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:53:13 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8GHrBpA49873034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:53:12 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF187A4053; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:53:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839A1A4051; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:53:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sig-9-145-147-20.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.147.20]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:53:11 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:53:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Sebastian Ott X-X-Sender: sebott@schleppi To: Cornelia Huck cc: Peter Oberparleiter , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/cio: fix intparm documentation In-Reply-To: <20190911164103.16156-1-cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20190911164103.16156-1-cohuck@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LFD 202 2017-01-01) Organization: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=22IBM_Deutschland_Research_&_Development_GmbH?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?_=2F_Vorsitzende_des_Aufsichtsrats=3A_Matthias?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?_Hartmann_Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrung=3A_Dirk_Wittkopp?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?_Sitz_der_Gesellschaft=3A_B=F6blingen_=2F_Reg?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?istergericht=3A_Amtsgericht_Stuttgart=2C_HRB_2432?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?94=22?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19091617-0012-0000-0000-0000034CB6E3 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19091617-0013-0000-0000-000021872E16 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-16_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=699 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909160175 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Cornelia Huck wrote: > The common I/O layer is maintaining an "intparm" inspired by > the hardware intparm for driver usage. This "intparm" is not > only applicaple for ssch, but also for hsch/csch. The kerneldoc > states that it is only updated for hsch/csch if no prior request > is pending; however, this is not what the code does (whether > that would actually desireable is a different issue.) > > Let's at least fix the kerneldoc for now. > > Fixes: b2ffd8e9a76e ("[S390] cio: Add docbook comments.") > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck I did a similar patch after a discusion with a colleague a couple of months ago but totally forgot about that... yours has better description and kdoc anyway ;-) Applied. Thanks!