Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932504AbVL1JGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:06:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932509AbVL1JGP (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:06:15 -0500 Received: from zoe.ndcservers.net ([204.10.38.178]:32191 "EHLO zoe.ndcservers.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932504AbVL1JGO (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:06:14 -0500 Message-ID: <026801c60b8d$ef128360$6501a8c0@ndciwkst01> From: "Shaun" To: "DervishD" Cc: References: <20051228085328.GA25380@DervishD> Subject: Re: Memory, where's it going? Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:06:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - zoe.ndcservers.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - unix-scripts.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1931 Lines: 51 I understand the concept and why things are cached, i've just never seen it cache this much before.. usually on a machine with bearly anything running on it (like this one) it uses bearly any memory at all. My concern is that with bearly anything running on it i already have dug into swap. Thanks for the responce, i just wanted to make sure their wasnt some type of a memory bug. ~Shaun ----- Original Message ----- From: "DervishD" To: "Shaun" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 12:53 AM Subject: Re: Memory, where's it going? > Hi Shaun :) > > * Shaun dixit: >> I see that free shows that 7.7GB is cached and i'm not sure why so >> much is cached. > > Because free memory is a *waste* of memory. Why leaving unused > memory when it can be used for caching? The kernel will (up to some > extent, I suppose) try to use all free memory for caching if no app > needs it. > > If you have 8GB of memory, it's a bit difficult to fill it just > with the running apps, so the kernel cleverly uses the rest for > caching things so the system runs faster. > > For example, I have 1GB of RAM, and even when I use X (seldom...) > I never eat up more than, let's say, 500MB. So, I have another 500MB > of memory unused: the kernel uses it as cache, and that makes my > system run much faster (I noticed a speed increase when I switch from > 512 to 1G). > > Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado > > -- > Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net > http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net > It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/