Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp5043160ybe; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:24:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgyGEUtDgTrqeSnYglKpeKvdVlDJD1UFJZU6CXh/mRtJ0kZF0F/Uh9U0PWw8iz8fYmqoFX X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d904:: with SMTP id a4mr3312985edr.41.1568708668209; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:24:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568708668; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pMM7QEZGseqozvUqBlEP/DbYlFPW8aWAgQnmZsZMavjQkPVUECm1aPjJGLNVDSGest XwJIHYXhd1FULnMSA1Nrl7ltsiDZj/yf9W2fAh7EPEMYPxUMlHiuUxx+vboI7F0u+kVj VinetfUmsIf6rYcD+s6pIEUE8lQk6Rn/AtdDeNUdr49uMFg2OfjjTo7i/obqPp41P4Fs IbPiOOtvXQJMhIhYmBKESOL15Co4F6EbuhikQLjUFBKvBjuVIVD9sQtPtKtyHFLQnJyI YFg6i1rX2+qQAJTvuuMDJN7RP2hEdx9fBr3JGX4htlrrseF69ZigN9+fiKfObnv9WfNd 18zQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=gHvCS0WVH6nxYtiVa7cmozt6ck7gFLQffDaRFaPUffg=; b=IeB7Vp9fct+d6p/ZE3O44JRQXAUdVYzO/dl2fPjPgsF9FJeVEoG1Hkz9aL3KzIr4p5 Hm61zMjZLzchDu4ghkQRkIlM/H8zS+4RIJWMfZgC7/unB3oUkCcmPqpCiCfFsx433wvu RTVHaOnBW0VTDwgg5lnOnT3q/AcMqfcB9KmU2KoghpZ+i/RGm2BP9bfuTPCq9EOS/VQZ IIdUKMPqWNwPylJ6JJ4gXy6EmP159gIAT290KIDyEw38PCtRezIKI9CbpV62UJJ5PAjL MxPftr69iDuguttg3/Oq1e1eYECdyEUXBsJqqamLiQEUrjXJQ8Ac2PtXddcEzp5cMVjn PtGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JVYTowaL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d17si885365eda.213.2019.09.17.01.24.04; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JVYTowaL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731551AbfIQAWM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:22:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:36505 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726118AbfIQAWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:22:12 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id m29so970995pgc.3; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:22:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gHvCS0WVH6nxYtiVa7cmozt6ck7gFLQffDaRFaPUffg=; b=JVYTowaLIzs55a08OwW7+1LUrzAWD08aN31/PaXOCbf6VJrKyRw4oxkO/HMDjDR2Ss VHJccL1WXw1Ard7nTI5inozA2xt6smVM7TWC0xWkmOUizHgkmg2IxsTHXbmBRn7U9MaG sqC8VPO3gCq40qVaeqVxB9vl67T+JNzolQGp7v86oNyTji1s6fXImtuUNR6vP0yVQA/q y+PxowdPxsSw0cY2njZ6lrxTEd1a7SFUHK63b5NDecQDSzmdrsIjn9QcIhvEGPJ30yko udvbDp0GzntKTVqq5pmxkwTz0ePE4jzL9WXbpT3+yprF7IQfOcPDo1gaMVWn/LyZKt1B OikA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gHvCS0WVH6nxYtiVa7cmozt6ck7gFLQffDaRFaPUffg=; b=mWHu0eLdfb/F0z61wTshFvLlkd+8e3oo0L2k3qCS8oCF37BpahDRSiTj+of/UfWTq8 3NaUHcr3UhBrubwHFR1XdCWG9CcO8sRj2fhkmpxLtSeOSDMgFpHIk23APkuK6t/03t0c UkyfuQOsArdXV6sVk8FUjr9oTyAE+1fCI87tGxYArb9ORAFyyWbNA0yo2WLsRRlUL8Y/ Z2M1VdCGRMEdjc+XmSnhNlQACV5vEEZzIQs+NzoHb6niDyrULOfB5/G+eF/d8scb0Bxh 35/nYR+krQyvSh4VNzoHy5RUrN06eBOF1BMO0KmkIZQIhpSZF+sKLcxVBDHKkYPuGH2w X8Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVJyPuRra5x3c7C1xWo4nrpCG/382wIsD421RQq9o62jZWH/ZhY dw8hNcc8C6PH825hB1/hNAo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:f15:: with SMTP id br21mr2033808pjb.101.1568679730699; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dtor-ws ([2620:15c:202:201:3adc:b08c:7acc:b325]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q204sm288345pfq.176.2019.09.16.17.22.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:22:07 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Andrew Lunn , Andrzej Hajda , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , Laurent Pinchart , Neil Armstrong , Russell King , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , ACPI Devel Maling List , netdev Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib Message-ID: <20190917002207.GJ237523@dtor-ws> References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches > > in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into > > individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to > > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() could be applied. > > I think it seems a bit enthusiastic to have non-GPIO subsystems > pick up these changes this close to the merge window so my plan > is to merge patches 1.2.3 (1 already merged) and then you could > massage the other subsystems in v5.4-rc1. > > But if other subsystems say "hey we want do fix this in like 3 days" > then I'm game for an immutable branch as well. No, if it is still has a chance for -rc1 then I'm good. I was thinking if it does not go into -rc1 I could convince some of them merge a targeted immutable branch off -rc8 or 5.3 final and then apply patches relevant to their subsystems so we do not have to wait till 5.6 to land everything. Thanks. -- Dmitry