Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:50:42 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/2] allow gcc4 to optimize unit-at-a-time
Message-ID: <20051228125042.GB9503@mars.ravnborg.org>
References: <20051228114701.GC3003@elte.hu> <20051228120435.GS22293@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20051228122815.GA9365@mars.ravnborg.org> <20051228130435.GU22293@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20051228124704.GA9503@mars.ravnborg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051228124704.GA9503@mars.ravnborg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1117
Lines: 29

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 08:04:35AM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > No.
> > -fno-unit-at-a-time should be used with GCCs that
> > a) support it
> > b) are older than GCC 4.0
> > 
> > The "$(GCC_VERSION) -lt 0400" test cares of b),
> > $(call cc-option,-fno-unit-at-a-time) cares of a).
> 
> There was a reason for disabling it unconditionally in first place.
> That was due to unexpected huge stack usage if I understand correct.
> Ingo's patch enebles unit-at-a-time only for gcc > 4.00 which should
> have this issue fixed.
> 
> If the argument is that we suddenly shall enable unit-at-a-time for
> gcc before 4.00 then we should visit the reasons why it originally was
> disabled.
Hi Jakub.

Reading your mail once more I understood it.
And you are right of course.

	Sam - on his way to get more coffee...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/