Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: X86: Fix userspace set broken combinations of CPUID and CR4
Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:16:25 +0800
Message-Id: <1568708186-20260-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
In-Reply-To: <1568708186-20260-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
References: <1568708186-20260-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>

Reported by syzkaller:

	WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6544 at /home/kernel/data/kvm/arch/x86/kvm//vmx/vmx.c:4689 handle_desc+0x37/0x40 [kvm_intel]
	CPU: 0 PID: 6544 Comm: a.out Tainted: G           OE     5.3.0-rc4+ #4
	RIP: 0010:handle_desc+0x37/0x40 [kvm_intel]
	Call Trace:
	 vmx_handle_exit+0xbe/0x6b0 [kvm_intel]
	 vcpu_enter_guest+0x4dc/0x18d0 [kvm]
	 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x407/0x660 [kvm]
	 kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3ad/0x690 [kvm]
	 do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x690
	 ksys_ioctl+0x6d/0x80
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
	 do_syscall_64+0x74/0x720
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

When CR4.UMIP is set, guest should have UMIP cpuid flag. Current
kvm set_sregs function doesn't have such check when userspace inputs
sregs values. SECONDARY_EXEC_DESC is enabled on writes to CR4.UMIP
in vmx_set_cr4 though guest doesn't have UMIP cpuid flag. The testcast
triggers handle_desc warning when executing ltr instruction since
guest architectural CR4 doesn't set UMIP. This patch fixes it by
adding valid CR4 and CPUID combination checking in __set_sregs.

syzkaller source: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=138efb99600000

Reported-by: syzbot+0f1819555fbdce992df9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index f7cfd8e..cafb4d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -884,34 +884,42 @@ int kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_xcr);
 
-int kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
+static int kvm_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
 {
-	unsigned long old_cr4 = kvm_read_cr4(vcpu);
-	unsigned long pdptr_bits = X86_CR4_PGE | X86_CR4_PSE | X86_CR4_PAE |
-				   X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE;
-
-	if (cr4 & CR4_RESERVED_BITS)
-		return 1;
-
 	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE))
-		return 1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SMEP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_SMEP))
-		return 1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SMAP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_SMAP))
-		return 1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_FSGSBASE))
-		return 1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PKU) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_PKE))
-		return 1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LA57) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_LA57))
-		return 1;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_UMIP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_UMIP))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
+{
+	unsigned long old_cr4 = kvm_read_cr4(vcpu);
+	unsigned long pdptr_bits = X86_CR4_PGE | X86_CR4_PSE | X86_CR4_PAE |
+				   X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE;
+
+	if (cr4 & CR4_RESERVED_BITS)
+		return 1;
+
+	if (kvm_valid_cr4(vcpu, cr4))
 		return 1;
 
 	if (is_long_mode(vcpu)) {
@@ -8675,7 +8683,8 @@ static int __set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
 	struct desc_ptr dt;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
-	if (kvm_valid_sregs(vcpu, sregs))
+	if (kvm_valid_sregs(vcpu, sregs) ||
+		kvm_valid_cr4(vcpu, sregs->cr4))
 		goto out;
 
 	apic_base_msr.data = sregs->apic_base;
-- 
2.7.4