Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964850AbVL1PwK (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:52:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932529AbVL1PwK (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:52:10 -0500 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:13235 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932435AbVL1PwJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:52:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] Introduce __memcpy_toio32 From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Matt Mackall , Linux Kernel Development , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: References: <7b7b442a4d6338ae8ca7.1135726915@eng-12.pathscale.com> <20051228035231.GA3356@waste.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: PathScale, Inc. Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:52:03 -0800 Message-Id: <1135785123.1527.114.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 456 Lines: 14 On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 16:18 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > BTW, does the original loop really work? I had to turn it into a for loop shortly after I posted it, for exactly the reason you pointed out.