Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:10:21 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve memset
Message-ID: <20190917201021.evoxxj7vkcb45rpg@treble>
References: <20190913072237.GA12381@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190913072237.GA12381@zn.tnic>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:22:37AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> In order to patch on machines which don't set X86_FEATURE_ERMS, I need
> to do a "reversed" patching of sorts, i.e., patch when the x86 feature
> flag is NOT set. See the below changes in alternative.c which basically
> add a flags field to struct alt_instr and thus control the patching
> behavior in apply_alternatives().
> 
> The result is this:
> 
> static __always_inline void *memset(void *dest, int c, size_t n)
> {
>         void *ret, *dummy;
> 
>         asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2_REVERSE("rep; stosb",
>                                            "call memset_rep",  X86_FEATURE_ERMS,
>                                            "call memset_orig", X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD)
>                 : "=&D" (ret), "=a" (dummy)
>                 : "0" (dest), "a" (c), "c" (n)
>                 /* clobbers used by memset_orig() and memset_rep_good() */
>                 : "rsi", "rdx", "r8", "r9", "memory");
> 
>         return dest;
> }

I think this also needs ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT.

Doesn't this break on older non-ERMS CPUs when the memset() is done
early, before alternative patching?

Could it instead do this?

	ALTERNATIVE_2("call memset_orig",
		      "call memset_rep",	X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD,
		      "rep; stosb",		X86_FEATURE_ERMS)

Then the "reverse alternatives" feature wouldn't be needed anyway.

-- 
Josh