Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp6061557ybe; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:15:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzbcX3G+z5+p7VEgRveybuMFRr4EDbL8Qxtxuwe9pMkwCQGSC2y/vE7tz6KFaoEXvZk1ugt X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:57c3:: with SMTP id u3mr7370700ejr.303.1568772907211; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:15:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568772907; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QtQHAOQwhb1OZI1T6yP3MHEw6GhBUEXDxanpWX2EbgjkHMvU1mvI7i9bcvQBK5niBK l6dRYJIhPRTGQSKtCJwc0TkHN0nhwWge3l7ILrRaLAUFFQrbQX1M3huvTCchZf2gCPLh j/b39C1/PaGefPr9QiZpp2GWGHgqxBUDvlS8HDZBNdMGQrxLwfkrCxpSn0M1PWDbPqX1 WIrifTV1++O8rCC6JF4gNiK8icWKRdx8xeZRTQXkdHF7bSbGmRqJ4XePLYgdt15qNiOy DFaie+BSLrLVkk40UZRY6OGEGbU+npEgmMF7MyD7LrZBCylLIZrQku8qAOF0zLBvzgml Q/SQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=qll1tloqDQ4i0lnHJuE14voE1ekPEugt3ZzCaYScXbc=; b=MXzruHkpVNs3PepPtkMNNB5liljJUxFPAqb/yHG7O/qhkG008rHPub3SojTChRfGBj V4NFe8AusACypfwV1LyYsqZI7K+x0Jq+QsBGInsLLugLEHdJ07C1llYPny9l07D2t/5S J+dVISfTNfr+SdG7OcatqfgxGly7iOtkM4KEWoQ/56kx9c+1wnRlXs0rCT/alBaXh9J/ 3nlK53XSqQ/iyUAsfoO5ilfc1np0/ytQydClhpieMVeQfcWqpurte82hsZVpeQSPIrWf r18FFp8kmW3cqVq4wqbcSDxHG1evPS01jQEKneV7XFveETPc9mgE76xsB+Q4CKQ5RNBL BAoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=vczL669Y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lu11si2161669ejb.215.2019.09.17.19.14.14; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=vczL669Y; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729629AbfIQPaj (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:30:39 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:42916 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729502AbfIQPai (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:30:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qll1tloqDQ4i0lnHJuE14voE1ekPEugt3ZzCaYScXbc=; b=vczL669YtI5E4IKwCcpkQJ42K Fj1bG6PlOtRzB4ABC47TbZy9qp7UMQIKh/n+/Sc0gh3jtWA8ifD27k0cufo38DVraR5VpDVCWXf3+ YJWZNGtFm8OsGKA0A699IblZjjyWODcVaqsazbk0J5CQm0vFh6NuPPtv28bZNiwBsEM6n3iQj6yrd XgC+DIM+wow3yz8bX41g7H9yJXcwTwaz0VxZ6k1hGmwuKFqJADWxlKrTro+Mo7LCMnu9+gQdi7af0 xo4+/r3pzO1aKpMEatk2CzqUq2tfkQgkzO+VOzxSuh+v2pEsiwvCzuSxVgqgIrZWhi3cbV7yio9O4 O6EKQvz7Q==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2002:4e20:1eda:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:40688) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iAFQz-0002ed-Rp; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:30:30 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iAFQx-0001P4-9j; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:30:27 +0100 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 16:30:27 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: tinywrkb Cc: Mark Rutland , Andrew Lunn , Baruch Siach , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , open list , Rob Herring , NXP Linux Team , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6dl: SolidRun: add phy node with 100Mb/s max-speed Message-ID: <20190917153027.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190910155507.491230-1-tinywrkb@gmail.com> <20190910185033.GD9761@lunn.ch> <87muf6oyvr.fsf@tarshish> <20190915135652.GC3427@lunn.ch> <20190917124101.GA1200564@arch-dsk-01> <20190917125434.GH20778@lunn.ch> <20190917133253.GA1210141@arch-dsk-01> <20190917133942.GR25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20190917151707.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190917151707.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 04:17:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 04:32:53PM +0300, tinywrkb wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 02:54:34PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:41:01PM +0300, tinywrkb wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 03:56:52PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > > > Tinywrkb confirmed to me in private communication that revert of > > > > > > > 5502b218e001 fixes Ethernet for him on effected system. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He also referred me to an old Cubox-i spec that lists 10/100 Ethernet > > > > > > > only for i.MX6 Solo/DualLite variants of Cubox-i. It turns out that > > > > > > > there was a plan to use a different 10/100 PHY for Solo/DualLite > > > > > > > SOMs. This plan never materialized. All SolidRun i.MX6 SOMs use the same > > > > > > > AR8035 PHY that supports 1Gb. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Commit 5502b218e001 might be triggering a hardware issue on the affected > > > > > > > Cubox-i. I could not reproduce the issue here with Cubox-i and a Dual > > > > > > > SOM variant running v5.3-rc8. I have no Solo/DualLite variant handy at > > > > > > > the moment. > > > > > > > > > > > > Could somebody with an affected device show us the output of ethtool > > > > > > with and without 5502b218e001. Does one show 1G has been negotiated, > > > > > > and the other 100Mbps? If this is true, how does it get 100Mbps > > > > > > without that patch? We are missing a piece of the puzzle. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > linux-test-5.1rc1-a2703de70942-without_bad_commit > > > > > > > > > > Settings for eth0: > > > > > Supported ports: [ TP MII ] > > > > > Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full > > > > > 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full > > > > > 1000baseT/Full > > > > > > > > So this means the local device says it can do 1000Mbps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Supported pause frame use: Symmetric > > > > > Supports auto-negotiation: Yes > > > > > Supported FEC modes: Not reported > > > > > Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full > > > > > 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full > > > > > 1000baseT/Full > > > > > > > > The link peer can also do 1000Mbps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric > > > > > Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes > > > > > Advertised FEC modes: Not reported > > > > > Link partner advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full > > > > > 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full > > > > > 1000baseT/Full > > > > > Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric > > > > > Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes > > > > > Link partner advertised FEC modes: Not reported > > > > > Speed: 100Mb/s > > > > > > > > Yet they have decided to do 100Mbps. > > > > > > > > We need to understand Why? The generic PHY driver would not do this on > > > > its own. So i'm thinking something has poked a PHY register with some > > > > value, and this patch is causing it to be over written. > > > > > > > > Please can you use mii-tool -v -v to dump the PHY registers in each > > > > case. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Andrew > > > > > > Here's the output of # mii-tool -v -v eth0 > > > > > > * linux-test-5.1rc1-a2703de70942-without_bad_commit > > > > > > Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947 > > > eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok > > > registers for MII PHY 0: > > > 3100 796d 004d d072 15e1 c5e1 000f 0000 > > > 0000 0000 0800 0000 0000 0000 0000 a000 > > > 0000 0000 0000 f420 082c 0000 04e8 0000 > > > 3200 3000 0000 063d 0000 0000 0000 0000 > > > product info: vendor 00:13:74, model 7 rev 2 > > > basic mode: autonegotiation enabled > > > basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok > > > capabilities: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > > > advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control > > > link partner: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control > > > > This is *not* advertising 1000baseT modes (register 9). > > > > > > > > > > > * linux-test-5.1rc1-5502b218e001-with_bad_commit > > > > > > Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947 > > > eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok > > > registers for MII PHY 0: > > > 3100 796d 004d d072 15e1 c5e1 000d 0000 > > > 0000 0000 0800 0000 0000 0000 0000 a000 > > > 0000 0000 0000 0000 082c 0000 04e8 0000 > > > 3200 3000 0000 063d 0000 0000 0000 0000 > > > product info: vendor 00:13:74, model 7 rev 2 > > > basic mode: autonegotiation enabled > > > basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok > > > capabilities: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > > > advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control > > > link partner: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control > > > > Neither is this. > > > > However, the kernel and phylib _thinks_ that it is. My guess is > > something has rewritten the PHY registers from userspace, rather > > than using ethtool to change the advertisment. The MAC is still > > trying to operate at 1000Mbps (since that is what phylib resolved) > > yet the link might be actually operating at 100Mbps - but for that > > to happen, we should've seen the link go down and up again. > > > > Odd. > > For reference, here I see: > > Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947 > eth0: negotiated 1000baseT-FD flow-control, link ok > registers for MII PHY 0: > 3100 796d 004d d072 15e1 c1e1 000d 0000 > 0000 0200 3800 0000 0000 0000 0000 a000 > 0000 0000 0000 0000 082c 0000 04e8 0000 > 3200 3000 0000 060e 0000 0000 0000 0000 > product info: vendor 00:13:74, model 7 rev 2 > basic mode: autonegotiation enabled > basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok > capabilities: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > advertising: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control > link partner: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD > > Note that userspace writing to register 9 (1G settings) will update > the physical PHY's advertisment for 1G speeds, but the kernel's idea > will not be updated, so things will become de-sync'd, and the kernel > _will_ incorrectly determine the speed. > > So, are you using mii-tool or mii-diag to change the negotiation > settings, rather than using ethtool? > > This is likely the case, as prior to 5502b218e001, we used to read > the advertisment registers afresh each time we evaluate the resulting > link mode. After 5502b218e001, we use the advertisment mask cached > in phydev->advertising, which, looking at phy_mii_ioctl(), will not > be updated if register 9 is written. Please try this patch - I haven't written a commit message for it yet, it's just to prove the above point. Thanks. drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 5 +++++ include/linux/mii.h | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c index 7af390d8bbdb..068a08a50064 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c @@ -458,6 +458,11 @@ int phy_mii_ioctl(struct phy_device *phydev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd) val); change_autoneg = true; break; + case MII_CTRL1000: + mii_ctrl1000_mod_linkmode_adv_t(phydev->advertising, + val); + change_autoneg = true; + break; default: /* do nothing */ break; diff --git a/include/linux/mii.h b/include/linux/mii.h index 5cd824c1c0ca..1249d32dbd63 100644 --- a/include/linux/mii.h +++ b/include/linux/mii.h @@ -455,6 +455,15 @@ static inline void mii_lpa_mod_linkmode_lpa_t(unsigned long *lp_advertising, lp_advertising, lpa & LPA_LPACK); } +static inline void mii_ctrl1000_mod_linkmode_adv_t(unsigned long *advertising, + u32 ctrl1000) +{ + linkmode_mod_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT, advertising, + ctrl1000 & ADVERTISE_1000HALF); + linkmode_mod_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT, advertising, + ctrl1000 & ADVERTISE_1000FULL); +} + /** * linkmode_adv_to_lcl_adv_t * @advertising:pointer to linkmode advertising -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up