Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Alejandro Hernandez <ajhernandez@ti.com>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 40/50] firmware: ti_sci: Always request response from firmware
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:19:23 +0200
Message-Id: <20190918061227.800697762@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190918061223.116178343@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190918061223.116178343@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>

commit 66f030eac257a572fbedab3d9646d87d647351fd upstream.

TI-SCI firmware will only respond to messages when the
TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED flag is set. Most messages already do
this, set this for the ones that do not.

This will be enforced in future firmware that better match the TI-SCI
specifications, this patch will not break users of existing firmware.

Fixes: aa276781a64a ("firmware: Add basic support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol")
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Tested-by: Alejandro Hernandez <ajhernandez@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
@@ -463,9 +463,9 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_get_revision(struc
 	struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
 	int ret;
 
-	/* No need to setup flags since it is expected to respond */
 	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_VERSION,
-				   0x0, sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr),
+				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
+				   sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr),
 				   sizeof(*rev_info));
 	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
@@ -593,9 +593,9 @@ static int ti_sci_get_device_state(const
 	info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
 	dev = info->dev;
 
-	/* Response is expected, so need of any flags */
 	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_GET_DEVICE_STATE,
-				   0, sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
+				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
+				   sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
 	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
 		dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);