Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964997AbVL2Dfi (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:35:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964998AbVL2Dfi (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:35:38 -0500 Received: from omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.83.154]:58085 "EHLO omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964997AbVL2Dfh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:35:37 -0500 Message-ID: <43B35986.90408@bigpond.net.au> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:35:34 +1100 From: Peter Williams User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Paolo Ornati , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Con Kolivas , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [SCHED] Totally WRONG prority calculation with specific test-case (since 2.6.10-bk12) References: <20051227190918.65c2abac@localhost> <20051227224846.6edcff88@localhost> <43B1D551.5050503@bigpond.net.au> <20051228112058.2c0c1137@localhost> <43B29540.1030904@bigpond.net.au> <43B3545D.3010508@yahoo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <43B3545D.3010508@yahoo.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at omta02ps.mx.bigpond.com from [147.10.133.38] using ID pwil3058@bigpond.net.au at Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:35:34 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1559 Lines: 49 Nick Piggin wrote: > Peter Williams wrote: > >> Paolo Ornati wrote: > > >>> 1) nicksched: perfect! This is the behaviour I want. >>> > ... > >>> >>> transcode get recognized for what it is, and I/O bounded processes >>> don't even notice that it is running :) >> >> >> >> Interesting. This one's more or less a dead scheduler and hasn't had >> any development work done on it for some time. I just keep porting >> the original version to new kernels. >> > > It isn't a dead scheduler any more than any of the other out of tree > schedulers are (which isn't saying much, unfortunately). Ingosched, staircase and my SPA schedulers are all evolving slowly. Are there any out there that I don't have in PlugSched that you think should be? > > I've probably got a small number of cleanups and microoptimisations > relative to what you have (I can't remember exactly what you sucked up) > ... but other than that there hasn't been much development work done for > some time because there is not much wrong with it. > I was starting to think that you'd lost interest in this which is why I said it was more or less dead. Sorry. Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/