Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp6389965ybe; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 02:40:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUK13wp9r7xPd0Vw3lAVUeLtYkfJ5V0em69FPY4CDcsDtW5ZU2Yx2c76DAgmhCi9g5bS01 X-Received: by 2002:a50:e70c:: with SMTP id a12mr9302415edn.73.1568799642271; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 02:40:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568799642; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N/aFNsZXJ7ufMrHsUysMmGdyKFhbYPBpXLG1yRChLtKKEnHjbZQ8t53m829OnBejeb VJ+vtjO+ADqP1kFYM1A3wxe5DFch9bN/Iez3rDWAu3Duem+lby5UQdv7E8DafkkR4z8Y Pf/ZwHcDijOqykvAo5YpCY+yOxBuwJ9BLssp4KkOvvBlnMtapl/Jcbp/LQHEc/Xcc+ZP q2M9m+2FG7jJT3bkfsAlmZM3emkX6UldMTNQ/dHKQcWcLnEoqORJmfJ/GlKIvLP9AHrK /Q5SIM0XUyNdK12yq+6DP4xwoRA3fUL/ugNKCXarwRxSGs5ovmx54zGsBBhD968b4GOy bHlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=88brxpX8BdWquRg1OtPWPOKHQPx+ohFfib45z57CIF8=; b=NQ6Lgul/fmbJVdNRh0AMHSMTP0RJiwW0Usa//hNsmMx6MsuDGClkkh+fGdPUsl0l+a h2Kwh7Bm9ycqhi0eC9rg8OZ2Qq5QuiZ9UrqwfeRJxlr6D3yfEmxx17o6Zd4LrD6m9aMT 1dx6pC0uyem70G9F0qN8OPdKCkOTzP9KkXzwpZ1dPB4tKrl779Ej62xloncL25qIM73w seRpE+C5pixHrXcx7XjGlXgeavFkqPfXNQpMc6hH5f2+BZcElyf8UtH8ie2upP9aehIE UGyv7Jk3TifWpI/iUHXllu7TIt0qOxKRVZl9SkYS1YhEBCfo982oIjGnUtkH/99El7iL ujuA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y3si3168950ede.38.2019.09.18.02.40.18; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 02:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730724AbfIRI6K (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 04:58:10 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:37732 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725909AbfIRI6J (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 04:58:09 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDD1337; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 01:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.20]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 463C03F59C; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 01:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:58:06 +0100 From: Andrew Murray To: Denis Efremov Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Gerald Schaefer Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/26] s390/pci: Use PCI_STD_NUM_BARS Message-ID: <20190918085805.GY9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190916204158.6889-1-efremov@linux.com> <20190916204158.6889-7-efremov@linux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190916204158.6889-7-efremov@linux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1+81 (426a6c1) (2018-08-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:41:38PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote: > Remove local definition PCI_BAR_COUNT for the number of PCI BARs and use > global one PCI_STD_NUM_BARS instead. > > Acked-by: Sebastian Ott > Cc: Gerald Schaefer > Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 5 +---- > arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h | 6 +++--- > arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c | 6 +++--- > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h > index a2399eff84ca..3a06c264ea53 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h > @@ -2,9 +2,6 @@ > #ifndef __ASM_S390_PCI_H > #define __ASM_S390_PCI_H > > -/* must be set before including pci_clp.h */ > -#define PCI_BAR_COUNT 6 > - > #include > #include > #include > @@ -138,7 +135,7 @@ struct zpci_dev { > > char res_name[16]; > bool mio_capable; > - struct zpci_bar_struct bars[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; > + struct zpci_bar_struct bars[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > > u64 start_dma; /* Start of available DMA addresses */ > u64 end_dma; /* End of available DMA addresses */ > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h > index 50359172cc48..bd2cb4ea7d93 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct mio_info { > struct { > u64 wb; > u64 wt; > - } addr[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; > + } addr[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > u32 reserved[6]; > } __packed; > > @@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ struct clp_rsp_query_pci { > u16 util_str_avail : 1; /* utility string available? */ > u16 pfgid : 8; /* pci function group id */ > u32 fid; /* pci function id */ > - u8 bar_size[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; > + u8 bar_size[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > u16 pchid; > - __le32 bar[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; > + __le32 bar[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > u8 pfip[CLP_PFIP_NR_SEGMENTS]; /* pci function internal path */ > u32 : 16; > u8 fmb_len; > diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c > index b0e3b9a0e488..aca372c8e34f 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c > +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(zpci_domain, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES); > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_domain_lock); > > #define ZPCI_IOMAP_ENTRIES \ > - min(((unsigned long) ZPCI_NR_DEVICES * PCI_BAR_COUNT / 2), \ > + min(((unsigned long) ZPCI_NR_DEVICES * PCI_STD_NUM_BARS / 2), \ > ZPCI_IOMAP_MAX_ENTRIES) > > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_iomap_lock); > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void __iomem *pci_iomap_range_mio(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, > void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, > unsigned long offset, unsigned long max) > { > - if (!pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) || bar >= PCI_BAR_COUNT) > + if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS || !pci_resource_len(pdev, bar)) > return NULL; > > if (static_branch_likely(&have_mio)) > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range_mio(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, > void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, > unsigned long offset, unsigned long max) > { > - if (!pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) || bar >= PCI_BAR_COUNT) > + if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS || !pci_resource_len(pdev, bar)) > return NULL; This looks like a latent bug fix here. If 'bar' is out of range we return NULL instead accessing an invalid item of an array. Should this not be a separate patch and tagged as stable? Thanks, Andrew Murray > > if (static_branch_likely(&have_mio)) > @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static void zpci_map_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev) > resource_size_t len; > int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { > len = pci_resource_len(pdev, i); > if (!len) > continue; > @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void zpci_unmap_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev) > if (zpci_use_mio(zdev)) > return; > > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { > len = pci_resource_len(pdev, i); > if (!len) > continue; > @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static int zpci_setup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev, > snprintf(zdev->res_name, sizeof(zdev->res_name), > "PCI Bus %04x:%02x", zdev->domain, ZPCI_BUS_NR); > > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { > if (!zdev->bars[i].size) > continue; > entry = zpci_alloc_iomap(zdev); > @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static void zpci_cleanup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev) > { > int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { > if (!zdev->bars[i].size || !zdev->bars[i].res) > continue; > > @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) > pdev->dev.dma_ops = &s390_pci_dma_ops; > zpci_map_resources(pdev); > > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { > res = &pdev->resource[i]; > if (res->parent || !res->flags) > continue; > diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c > index 9bdff4defef1..8b729b5f2972 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c > +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int clp_store_query_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev, > { > int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { > zdev->bars[i].val = le32_to_cpu(response->bar[i]); > zdev->bars[i].size = response->bar_size[i]; > } > @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int clp_store_query_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev, > sizeof(zdev->util_str)); > } > zdev->mio_capable = response->mio_addr_avail; > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { > - if (!(response->mio.valid & (1 << (PCI_BAR_COUNT - i - 1)))) > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { > + if (!(response->mio.valid & (1 << (PCI_STD_NUM_BARS - i - 1)))) > continue; > > zdev->bars[i].mio_wb = (void __iomem *) response->mio.addr[i].wb; > -- > 2.21.0 >