Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp6421643ybe; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:14:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxzljLCvvjYw6WhHErh3eSdnYj3+RQPol6h21tuAvs1ThRnNeHEnm4Fy3XulGWOVyvJGAwy X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b283:: with SMTP id q3mr6049695ejz.7.1568801682482; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:14:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568801682; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ek/O0w1k+OXPbdrP1fgxue/tiyVaTJyZnh/ga8nyyGurpXpKZ2Hxh4qEzm8proZ4jm 9FYE9y3hKkOEWSbsVud9jXJkjsXZlkzntBVFDn2pMFO4bCjKVwOx6wAxr6GLgA6+a13e YIBr+GnlbH/knRhLAgmzV6gpIkKxvE5FUK6EC++BnMQ75JK3G4aQTq9nJpk6ax2+cg14 SKUIgfyhQwXgHdo6CtRxnnzcI1SeiEXZ2nJE6++MwwKqPiRwX7QKdMNrVGB/mGsI7d1j LhW86RY5V6Ect8MceifrfAhyB6ujGO4lH7aQGsMZNiBEAsbmOPKXeDW7xDNU4FQZQCsK 5wwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=JzNHZht1bd6w8WtrKX6lmZo1NhKQxsQQoKxRAfLfPag=; b=yH/0rzOPyORq/kr1DD6rX0Coip5NcRLPp/e5MPaq/IJvhQHEIjGoEcEvUnKJwhbLQY xVe+f3Ckn7WJjLhfISYpAwm+C5xHv/lyIYT2L0toSorFJ8Q6YORups7VuBE3ur4j+NoM X8+0+Z/kesWnDl6Ntgt06Sn6UIAphPfkdQSZi39YS5EBvRgRFpzCLEzu4jYkuJAIOF2g nxcTDy74O67EV9NEswA/s+W3hxVGbTx7DVht0coDx6V6eGuRin0XAl8NtpDiCL290zhH vtwAkHxGp2KIh8eTO3vhWBnwd6mdYT66WS2TPdIT8qHPTzkl/pVtIDFmTezr0hoUw1VK QWtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=cFV6lZrP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d1si2433777ejk.376.2019.09.18.03.14.19; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=cFV6lZrP; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729575AbfIRKMX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:12:23 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com ([209.85.167.66]:45960 "EHLO mail-lf1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728649AbfIRKMX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:12:23 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r134so5210450lff.12 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:12:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=JzNHZht1bd6w8WtrKX6lmZo1NhKQxsQQoKxRAfLfPag=; b=cFV6lZrPn1Mcf4EtX5AxtvIqIB1Qk4sGu9JQlMv9h7FqQpBqv/aXUI+14JI21629HA lkOuieXLAl/nkeBUyxDgGxcI1rwy2EvvU59BVBmKIN+cpFE1Uw+42ItVzXATDn/Vdtxd iQuMqn9GMssOl1d4JRTjpsiS5u/Pwfs1rnpSsCoigwBi89ovKKwmAPhnULg1PPfp3Clv xWvFgOiCbBH+oAe2OiwCm9MwC2HYhsRxBcbHl6pnb5uTBr8etIffKratODyx5yz4NHp3 ikvmSAsrEy8FN2AzOhNVNxuQm1CtCiRqloW8AZFIMLAJAm2xuZroldu5PFrMj+TiTzvJ sWYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=JzNHZht1bd6w8WtrKX6lmZo1NhKQxsQQoKxRAfLfPag=; b=S7/cn8220bk7TRApa84ZsQwOZeEZm7fDb9JQrbtSm1XX6te7aSaYebIH8rrGJD8svO w8QURDITxni/i/ec+uyb0CH5/1H2yhQ2SZnbSv4yBCIpGjTZOXXYYvb7+z8p+DTezPRT 76Qz6jGIcdAK1NqgUPhIkEWVeQVtQYgjhwQKCZfum4eD92eofSUsJcDtMLGiKpPy/3cT gY5bN6PyOb2qMq5h/Q6OYu5l06GC8rSrVxsL1+WtcntRQh58DHC8Pynba7VmBbGgkxFY DSkMTAvA00JFYYw0gs+QjmtoHrHqOJmQrECjcufduH9AoszRIiY25YNLGowEAqL/rDGJ IawQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVoVSfhs8gyd+lxmrKoJD/09lKt6B68xosDMsOXw0U0F7/FLF4k 3Ya4pLTb3WpxqIWpzEwULmuROg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4308:: with SMTP id l8mr1641108lfh.25.1568801540147; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khorivan (168-200-94-178.pool.ukrtel.net. [178.94.200.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77sm951751ljf.85.2019.09.18.03.12.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:12:17 +0300 From: Ivan Khoronzhuk To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Yonghong Song , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , john fastabend , open list , Networking , bpf , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/14] samples: bpf: add makefile.target for separate CC target build Message-ID: <20190918101216.GA2908@khorivan> Mail-Followup-To: Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Yonghong Song , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , john fastabend , open list , Networking , bpf , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com References: <20190916105433.11404-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> <20190916105433.11404-8-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 04:19:40PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: >On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:58 AM Ivan Khoronzhuk > wrote: >> >> The makefile.target is added only and will be used in > >typo: Makefile > >> sample/bpf/Makefile later in order to switch cross-compiling on CC > >on -> to > >> from HOSTCC environment. >> >> The HOSTCC is supposed to build binaries and tools running on the host >> afterwards, in order to simplify build or so, like "fixdep" or else. >> In case of cross compiling "fixdep" is executed on host when the rest >> samples should run on target arch. In order to build binaries for >> target arch with CC and tools running on host with HOSTCC, lets add >> Makefile.target for simplicity, having definition and routines similar >> to ones, used in script/Makefile.host. This allows later add >> cross-compilation to samples/bpf with minimum changes. >> >> The tprog stands for target programs built with CC. > >Why tprog? Could we just use prog: hostprog vs prog. Prev. version was with prog, but Yonghong Song found it ambiguous. As prog can be bpf also. So, decision was made to follow logic: * target prog - non bpf progs * bpf prog = bpf prog, that can be later smth similar, providing build options for each bpf object separately. Details here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/13/1037 > >> >> Makefile.target contains only stuff needed for samples/bpf, potentially >> can be reused later and now needed only for unblocking tricky >> samples/bpf cross compilation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk >> --- >> samples/bpf/Makefile.target | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 samples/bpf/Makefile.target >> >> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile.target b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..fb6de63f7d2f >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile.target >> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +# ========================================================================== >> +# Building binaries on the host system >> +# Binaries are not used during the compilation of the kernel, and intendent > >typo: intended > >> +# to be build for target board, target board can be host ofc. Added to build > >What's ofc, is it "of course"? yes, ofc ) > >> +# binaries to run not on host system. >> +# >> +# Sample syntax (see Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst for reference) >> +# tprogs-y := xsk_example >> +# Will compile xdpsock_example.c and create an executable named xsk_example > >You mix references to xsk_example and xdpsock_example, which is very >confusing. I'm guessing you meant to use xdpsock_example consistently. Oh, yes. Thanks. > >> +# >> +# tprogs-y := xdpsock >> +# xdpsock-objs := xdpsock_1.o xdpsock_2.o >> +# Will compile xdpsock_1.c and xdpsock_2.c, and then link the executable >> +# xdpsock, based on xdpsock_1.o and xdpsock_2.o >> +# >> +# Inherited from scripts/Makefile.host > >"Inspired by" or "Derived from" would be probably more appropriate term :) I will replace with "Derived from", looks better. > >> +# >> +__tprogs := $(sort $(tprogs-y)) >> + >> +# C code >> +# Executables compiled from a single .c file >> +tprog-csingle := $(foreach m,$(__tprogs), \ >> + $(if $($(m)-objs),,$(m))) >> + >> +# C executables linked based on several .o files >> +tprog-cmulti := $(foreach m,$(__tprogs),\ >> + $(if $($(m)-objs),$(m))) >> + >> +# Object (.o) files compiled from .c files >> +tprog-cobjs := $(sort $(foreach m,$(__tprogs),$($(m)-objs))) >> + >> +tprog-csingle := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(tprog-csingle)) >> +tprog-cmulti := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(tprog-cmulti)) >> +tprog-cobjs := $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(tprog-cobjs)) >> + >> +##### >> +# Handle options to gcc. Support building with separate output directory >> + >> +_tprogc_flags = $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) \ >> + $(TPROGCFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) >> + >> +# $(objtree)/$(obj) for including generated headers from checkin source files >> +ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) >> +ifdef building_out_of_srctree >> +_tprogc_flags += -I $(objtree)/$(obj) >> +endif >> +endif >> + >> +tprogc_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(_tprogc_flags) >> + >> +# Create executable from a single .c file >> +# tprog-csingle -> Executable >> +quiet_cmd_tprog-csingle = CC $@ >> + cmd_tprog-csingle = $(CC) $(tprogc_flags) $(TPROGS_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $< \ >> + $(TPROGS_LDLIBS) $(TPROGLDLIBS_$(@F)) >> +$(tprog-csingle): $(obj)/%: $(src)/%.c FORCE >> + $(call if_changed_dep,tprog-csingle) >> + >> +# Link an executable based on list of .o files, all plain c >> +# tprog-cmulti -> executable >> +quiet_cmd_tprog-cmulti = LD $@ >> + cmd_tprog-cmulti = $(CC) $(tprogc_flags) $(TPROGS_LDFLAGS) -o $@ \ >> + $(addprefix $(obj)/,$($(@F)-objs)) \ >> + $(TPROGS_LDLIBS) $(TPROGLDLIBS_$(@F)) >> +$(tprog-cmulti): $(tprog-cobjs) FORCE >> + $(call if_changed,tprog-cmulti) >> +$(call multi_depend, $(tprog-cmulti), , -objs) >> + >> +# Create .o file from a single .c file >> +# tprog-cobjs -> .o >> +quiet_cmd_tprog-cobjs = CC $@ >> + cmd_tprog-cobjs = $(CC) $(tprogc_flags) -c -o $@ $< >> +$(tprog-cobjs): $(obj)/%.o: $(src)/%.c FORCE >> + $(call if_changed_dep,tprog-cobjs) >> -- >> 2.17.1 >> > >tprogs is quite confusing, but overall looks good to me. I tend to leave it as tprogs, unless it's going to be progs and agreed with Yonghong. It follows logic: - tprogs for bins - bpfprogs or bojs or bprogs (could be) for bpf obj -- Regards, Ivan Khoronzhuk