Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp6588798ybe; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:04:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwHI1otzXN318iVvNATMCt5L/LsJTpwzvnqXCGjzZSoY5vNZaBQGCdwJtjFbSupA1XzvSZ1 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:a50:: with SMTP id bt16mr10077042edb.114.1568811871695; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:04:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568811871; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r7cWsEaDo0xEO29T/j4Duys8qJC27WcnD9T8YBmmkgHEEt60vPyrH28PaeWIk4l29c c3mFFYrVgMgVVY/WrBe44zze/NxjxxLCBmg4OSsmahyt/fw6bK4WNVUtHLulRejw1KWA jnSW2t1YrvYsFyW/iVkwmE9Z6v0hV/evgSX/wI8yf/uL9v/tjkXotC8bX7Z5FDlaww6F XDoAFB2+6slvBO1Vz2+GJJdU5pFbDOkrFxfe1AtndZ/zfWYBf4k15EmVLP7HDEHqtGRG AZZ4i0/lP0mwMYl5mX8nec0PtYepPqFkY96/w+/iG4uC1hNSdxBF3yZns6S1O264P6+k qWSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=9PtR81d2/BrbBbGX1lDCMSHkM+8/CdLpUz0VKKfyMWU=; b=v5zr1VQQdC/yeGkPaj++aBbzDmuT/tIBg9DM89Rj8GIhEBi3nHUwq8UhliklFGWoIs dSjS69a6/9RwA2tdJEXks3jrYsmJg/9WRWgHrzqMDtIUNb/eC3UbofLjrKa0sMZFrmGh 6xiymYPLg2szptQDIPMKqW/sbm6O/hHNbJSvhYkQ2eKdoKBL6Vbe3h3oEdYIDL4CjMK0 jKVHC1OzBi3tJh8lKeJG9iGE0a5IyZZaM/DXH1QV0EY33O7+Kcctj9nqh7XGEtILKnkq T50JwG8OU61e2Ughf8YSbHeQTq2J941u+F5RZwGpJsyeb0ZWp/R8sfbeadymdnAoWq7a T3ig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c7si2579848ejr.360.2019.09.18.06.04.06; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729745AbfIRKXR (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:23:17 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:38712 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728507AbfIRKXR (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 06:23:17 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA0F337; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.61] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E209F3F59C; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 03:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3: Fix GIC_LINE_NR accessor To: Zenghui Yu Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com References: <1568789850-14080-1-git-send-email-yuzenghui@huawei.com> From: Marc Zyngier Organization: Approximate Message-ID: <89645aea-70d4-8456-cb47-5a11846fa934@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:23:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1568789850-14080-1-git-send-email-yuzenghui@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/09/2019 07:57, Zenghui Yu wrote: > As per GIC spec, ITLinesNumber indicates the maximum SPI INTID that > the GIC implementation supports. And the maximum SPI INTID an > implementation might support is 1019 (field value 11111). > > max(GICD_TYPER_SPIS(...), 1020) is not what we actually want for > GIC_LINE_NR. Fix it to min(GICD_TYPER_SPIS(...), 1020). > > Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu > --- > > Hi Marc, > > I still see "GICv3: 992 SPIs implemented" on the host. I go back to > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11078623/ and it seems that we > failed to make the GIC_LINE_NR correct at that time. Ah, nice catch. Clearly, I didn't have my head screwed on properly when I wrote this. I'll take this in for the next round of fixes. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...