Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:22:17 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
Message-ID: <20051229082217.GA23052@elte.hu>
References: <1135726300.22744.25.camel@mindpipe> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0512282205450.2963@goblin.wat.veritas.com> <1135814419.7680.13.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1135814419.7680.13.camel@mindpipe>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 710
Lines: 21


* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure how much work it would be to break out 
> CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE as a separate patch.

could you check out the 2.6.15-rc7 version of the latency tracer i 
uploaded to:

	http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/

could test it by e.g. trying to reproduce the same VM latency as in the 
-rt tree. [the two zlib patches are needed if you are using 4K stacks, 
mcount increases stack footprint.]

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/