Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:40:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/50] 4.19.74-stable review
Message-ID: <20190918134003.GF1908968@kroah.com>
References: <20190918061223.116178343@linuxfoundation.org>
 <b1cff98a-d08f-d6cc-393f-9ca80c9229fe@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b1cff98a-d08f-d6cc-393f-9ca80c9229fe@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:59:09AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/17/19 11:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.74 release.
> > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> I see lots of build failures.
> 
> kernel/module.c: In function 'free_module':
> kernel/module.c:2187:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'disable_ro_nx'; did you mean 'disable_irq'?
> 
> kernel/module.c: In function 'load_module':
> kernel/module.c:3828:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_disable_nx'; did you mean 'module_disable_ro'?
> 
> Reverting
> 
> ed510bd0bce3 modules: fix compile error if don't have strict module rwx
> 22afe9550160 modules: fix BUG when load module with rodata=n
> 
> fixes the problem.

Ugh, I thought I got these right.  Let me see what I got wrong in the
backport...

Any hint as to what the .config is here that is causing the problems?

greg k-h