Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp6685737ybe; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:29:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRAe88eN0E2RdVSmCYMoArZ02MuIOI1hGcNgjImT4qlAlWOmERdQfJZsjikJbdt+D7540h X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1212:: with SMTP id c18mr2359848edw.259.1568816963672; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:29:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568816963; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ir8925O+nErkAI5jgfU8A3UerdKfvTP/S4+iq9EwT0qdjbaJq54O+KIQr1wdVCC9EP 0FcFgg/gjrJnaX4Defrx2AlDLPX3/uJtHaB9nSlJ0I+XKvzFxqhG9mIdGfZ/M54Nctni mOZHL7UrqptqC+MQg8NxeX2LeOHReBYirYnkz3VGX8RmW9z36Ixy8rr8SJduvn6nWAH3 ds6/+4EVkWs5e2gdelczlznEeZIFIMQB/kGK01v1WJ7FVcskDk/O9TLVA49Eeje0y6rY YBdUM5/omvT9ApMnk2WHrzxw4HCemYWNZ4j1A649Qu2d1IzwVuA3kfArX/JughAcXstA rZvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:reply-to; bh=400pvBocvt0a62SbRKwLyz08gWO35MVfJMPe2DLlqA0=; b=N2/G51D/fcA6psZFrHw1Qiz7to3AUCLRtoRAZbvBan6QuTFGjZsv/h6KaUvmr++jPZ 0HneH+QoD5RHZQmYS0DnL/T+Xa9deArlh+hYFDBmFjoMmzFoQvkq9+yhp+MglfuKm8EF r3JRnxctEIZJP14VxDLlj74c42fMPGv/8pnyCUooiu2RA00ZOt6vO9UtmPFi5bomR7nJ 6S3IdKlnbZ+au+EXnSqnkIK/qH2sr34l3QX9Ug3SSgo6LNUPBUu6WNeE1DGxt9h0bB9a DlJpgCva9NwpDMOWjPPjTHfHYfafPEvzdAhPneQ6QjF92kc6cBNvYzIEGoCxmthv3qHV Bxrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s54si3723883edm.215.2019.09.18.07.28.59; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728360AbfIRO1E (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:27:04 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com ([209.85.208.67]:38951 "EHLO mail-ed1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727273AbfIRO1D (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:27:03 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g12so169063eds.6; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=400pvBocvt0a62SbRKwLyz08gWO35MVfJMPe2DLlqA0=; b=fnSwKR1VJeE3F4JaJydrKtOeTPqp12dpwM77BCPXUDdhvzgmHccXKrq/oCsmCq1FLG U+mYI5xbw8JaZlT8Qg9Mp/FaMkYY3gQ/Wu+ZEBiBxtifdCyrqD28gXbMnesNP9VARrRN 0gVzbNehBj9OquvfHZl39p101gmIvuyvvUBW9S03klJuoyBTwJ/dR9gBVYotIhxIXTcU tmc+VareCVxtjos5vNuGij/Eq+QSJAdUJnjTPJN3i1++vBt3tf2FH8m4m+TQT7qBpi09 PRNw6ZMrcGqXD740MgcdBjYDVIRDyT8o9Iy30OpiENexqd0HasM8c3XGR8Gpavjouu9p BJ1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV3IIUAZgB/qHmtN5XuMfpK0KewUSoFlIIv/aRuvRdzArrQG2cm NUHNX73V9DShikFFPsLm2U0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:493:: with SMTP id f19mr9629887eja.285.1568816821022; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.2.174] (bran.ispras.ru. [83.149.199.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ci8sm245279ejb.71.2019.09.18.07.27.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: efremov@linux.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/26] s390/pci: Use PCI_STD_NUM_BARS To: Andrew Murray Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Gerald Schaefer References: <20190916204158.6889-1-efremov@linux.com> <20190916204158.6889-7-efremov@linux.com> <20190918085805.GY9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> From: Denis Efremov Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:26:59 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190918085805.GY9720@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/18/19 11:58 AM, Andrew Murray wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:41:38PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote: >> Remove local definition PCI_BAR_COUNT for the number of PCI BARs and use >> global one PCI_STD_NUM_BARS instead. >> >> Acked-by: Sebastian Ott >> Cc: Gerald Schaefer >> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov >> --- >> arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 5 +---- >> arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h | 6 +++--- >> arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 16 ++++++++-------- >> arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c | 6 +++--- >> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h >> index a2399eff84ca..3a06c264ea53 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h >> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h >> @@ -2,9 +2,6 @@ >> #ifndef __ASM_S390_PCI_H >> #define __ASM_S390_PCI_H >> >> -/* must be set before including pci_clp.h */ >> -#define PCI_BAR_COUNT 6 >> - >> #include >> #include >> #include >> @@ -138,7 +135,7 @@ struct zpci_dev { >> >> char res_name[16]; >> bool mio_capable; >> - struct zpci_bar_struct bars[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; >> + struct zpci_bar_struct bars[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; >> >> u64 start_dma; /* Start of available DMA addresses */ >> u64 end_dma; /* End of available DMA addresses */ >> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h >> index 50359172cc48..bd2cb4ea7d93 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h >> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_clp.h >> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct mio_info { >> struct { >> u64 wb; >> u64 wt; >> - } addr[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; >> + } addr[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; >> u32 reserved[6]; >> } __packed; >> >> @@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ struct clp_rsp_query_pci { >> u16 util_str_avail : 1; /* utility string available? */ >> u16 pfgid : 8; /* pci function group id */ >> u32 fid; /* pci function id */ >> - u8 bar_size[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; >> + u8 bar_size[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; >> u16 pchid; >> - __le32 bar[PCI_BAR_COUNT]; >> + __le32 bar[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; >> u8 pfip[CLP_PFIP_NR_SEGMENTS]; /* pci function internal path */ >> u32 : 16; >> u8 fmb_len; >> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c >> index b0e3b9a0e488..aca372c8e34f 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c >> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(zpci_domain, ZPCI_NR_DEVICES); >> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_domain_lock); >> >> #define ZPCI_IOMAP_ENTRIES \ >> - min(((unsigned long) ZPCI_NR_DEVICES * PCI_BAR_COUNT / 2), \ >> + min(((unsigned long) ZPCI_NR_DEVICES * PCI_STD_NUM_BARS / 2), \ >> ZPCI_IOMAP_MAX_ENTRIES) >> >> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zpci_iomap_lock); >> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void __iomem *pci_iomap_range_mio(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, >> void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, >> unsigned long offset, unsigned long max) >> { >> - if (!pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) || bar >= PCI_BAR_COUNT) >> + if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS || !pci_resource_len(pdev, bar)) >> return NULL; >> >> if (static_branch_likely(&have_mio)) >> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range_mio(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, >> void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, >> unsigned long offset, unsigned long max) >> { >> - if (!pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) || bar >= PCI_BAR_COUNT) >> + if (bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS || !pci_resource_len(pdev, bar)) >> return NULL; > > This looks like a latent bug fix here. If 'bar' is out of range we return > NULL instead accessing an invalid item of an array. Should this not be > a separate patch and tagged as stable? > This fix was suggested by Bjorn in v1 review: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/12/997 > Thanks, > > Andrew Murray > >> >> if (static_branch_likely(&have_mio)) >> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static void zpci_map_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> resource_size_t len; >> int i; >> >> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { >> len = pci_resource_len(pdev, i); >> if (!len) >> continue; >> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static void zpci_unmap_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> if (zpci_use_mio(zdev)) >> return; >> >> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { >> len = pci_resource_len(pdev, i); >> if (!len) >> continue; >> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static int zpci_setup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev, >> snprintf(zdev->res_name, sizeof(zdev->res_name), >> "PCI Bus %04x:%02x", zdev->domain, ZPCI_BUS_NR); >> >> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { >> if (!zdev->bars[i].size) >> continue; >> entry = zpci_alloc_iomap(zdev); >> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static void zpci_cleanup_bus_resources(struct zpci_dev *zdev) >> { >> int i; >> >> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { >> if (!zdev->bars[i].size || !zdev->bars[i].res) >> continue; >> >> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> pdev->dev.dma_ops = &s390_pci_dma_ops; >> zpci_map_resources(pdev); >> >> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { >> res = &pdev->resource[i]; >> if (res->parent || !res->flags) >> continue; >> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c >> index 9bdff4defef1..8b729b5f2972 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c >> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int clp_store_query_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev, >> { >> int i; >> >> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { >> zdev->bars[i].val = le32_to_cpu(response->bar[i]); >> zdev->bars[i].size = response->bar_size[i]; >> } >> @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int clp_store_query_pci_fn(struct zpci_dev *zdev, >> sizeof(zdev->util_str)); >> } >> zdev->mio_capable = response->mio_addr_avail; >> - for (i = 0; i < PCI_BAR_COUNT; i++) { >> - if (!(response->mio.valid & (1 << (PCI_BAR_COUNT - i - 1)))) >> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) { >> + if (!(response->mio.valid & (1 << (PCI_STD_NUM_BARS - i - 1)))) >> continue; >> >> zdev->bars[i].mio_wb = (void __iomem *) response->mio.addr[i].wb; >> -- >> 2.21.0 >>