Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932359AbVL2KUz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:20:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932499AbVL2KUz (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:20:55 -0500 Received: from c158130.vh.plala.or.jp ([210.150.158.130]:20619 "EHLO mvs2.plala.or.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932359AbVL2KUy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2005 05:20:54 -0500 Message-ID: <43B3B94D.4040000@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:24:13 +0900 From: cai User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: zh-cn,zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "OGAWA Hirofumi ;penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI" CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [RFC][fat] use mpage_readpage when cluster size is page-alignment References: <87u0ctwf93.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <43B3844A.5050401@gmail.com> <87y824p8ft.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <87y824p8ft.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 649 Lines: 22 hi, >Ah, yes. > >But if cluster is not fragmented it shouldn't fall back, and rather it >will get advantage. And I guess, even if it fall back to >block_read_full_page(), it would be very trivial. > >What do you think? We may need benchmark... > > i think you are right, i didn't think of adjacent-cluster so maybe just calling mpage_readpage{s} is enough. thanks. junjie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/