Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To:     mingo@redhat.com
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        chiluk+linux@indeed.com, pauld@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: fix -Wunused-but-set-variable warnings
Date:   Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:01:44 -0400
Message-Id: <1568833304-5148-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

The commit de53fd7aedb1 ("sched/fair: Fix low cpu usage with high
throttling by removing expiration of cpu-local slices") introduced a few
compilation warnings:

  kernel/sched/fair.c: In function '__refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime':
  kernel/sched/fair.c:4365:6: warning: variable 'now' set but not used
    [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  kernel/sched/fair.c: In function 'start_cfs_bandwidth':
  kernel/sched/fair.c:4992:6: warning: variable 'overrun' set but not
    used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

Also, __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime() does no longer update the
expiration time, so fix the comments accordingly.

Fixes: de53fd7aedb1 ("sched/fair: Fix low cpu usage with high throttling by removing expiration of cpu-local slices")
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linux@indeed.com>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
---

Resend it since the offensive commit is now in the mainline.

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d4bbf68c3161..b4fb016e3557 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4354,21 +4354,16 @@ static inline u64 sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * Replenish runtime according to assigned quota and update expiration time.
- * We use sched_clock_cpu directly instead of rq->clock to avoid adding
- * additional synchronization around rq->lock.
+ * Replenish runtime according to assigned quota. We use sched_clock_cpu
+ * directly instead of rq->clock to avoid adding additional synchronization
+ * around rq->lock.
  *
  * requires cfs_b->lock
  */
 void __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 {
-	u64 now;
-
-	if (cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF)
-		return;
-
-	now = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
-	cfs_b->runtime = cfs_b->quota;
+	if (cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF)
+		cfs_b->runtime = cfs_b->quota;
 }
 
 static inline struct cfs_bandwidth *tg_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg)
@@ -4994,15 +4989,13 @@ static void init_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 
 void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 {
-	u64 overrun;
-
 	lockdep_assert_held(&cfs_b->lock);
 
 	if (cfs_b->period_active)
 		return;
 
 	cfs_b->period_active = 1;
-	overrun = hrtimer_forward_now(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
+	hrtimer_forward_now(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
 	hrtimer_start_expires(&cfs_b->period_timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1